Literature DB >> 24664153

Assessment of agreement and trending between haemodynamic monitors is still challenging.

Oliver Hunsicker1, Aarne Feldheiser, Klaus-Dieter Wernecke, Claudia Spies.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24664153     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3268-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Stroke volume determination using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis in severe aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Martin Petzoldt; Carsten Riedel; Jan Braeunig; Sebastian Haas; Matthias S Goepfert; Hendrik Treede; Stephan Baldus; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies--with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Jan Poloniecki; Giorgio Della Rocca; R Michael Grounds
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Cardiac output method comparison studies: the relation of the precision of agreement and the precision of method.

Authors:  Alexander Hapfelmeier; Maurizio Cecconi; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  How precise is "precision" of hemodynamic measurements in clinical validation studies?

Authors:  Martin Petzoldt; Bernd Saugel; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Comparison of the non-invasive Nexfin® monitor with conventional methods for the measurement of arterial blood pressure in moderate risk orthopaedic surgery patients.

Authors:  Felix Balzer; Marit Habicher; Michael Sander; Julian Sterr; Stephanie Scholz; Aarne Feldheiser; Michael Müller; Carsten Perka; Sascha Treskatsch
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.