Literature DB >> 24662879

Shock index predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

Viraj Pandit1, Peter Rhee, Ammar Hashmi, Narong Kulvatunyou, Andrew Tang, Mazhar Khalil, Terence O'Keeffe, Donald Green, Randall S Friese, Bellal Joseph.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart rate and systolic blood pressure are unreliable in geriatric trauma patients. Shock index (SI) (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) is a simple marker of worse outcomes after injury. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of SI in predicting outcomes. We hypothesized that SI predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients.
METHODS: We performed a 4-year (2007-2010) retrospective analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients 65 years or older were included. Transferred patients, patients dead on arrival, missing vitals on presentation, and patients with burns and traumatic brain injury were excluded. A cutoff value of SI greater than or equal to 1 (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 79%) was used to define hemodynamic instability. The primary outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcome measures were need for blood transfusion, need for exploratory laparotomy, and development of in-hospital complications. Multiple logistic regressions were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 485,595 geriatric patients were reviewed, of whom 217,190 were included. The mean (SD) age was 77.7 (7.1) years, 60% were males, median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 14 (range, 3-15), median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9 (range, 4-18), and mean (SD) SI was 0.58 (0.18). Three percent (n = 6,585) had an SI greater than or equal to 1. Patients with SI greater than or equal to 1 were more likely to require blood product requirement (p = 0.001), require an exploratory laparotomy (p = 0.01), and have in-hospital complications (p = 0.02). The overall mortality rate was 4.1% (n = 8,952). SI greater than or equal to 1 was the strongest predictor for mortality (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-3.3; p = 0.001) in geriatric trauma patients. Systolic blood pressure (p = 0.09) and heart rate (p = 0.2) were not predictive of mortality.
CONCLUSION: SI is an accurate and specific predictor of morbidity and mortality in geriatric trauma patients. SI is superior to heart rate and systolic blood pressure for predicting mortality in geriatric trauma patients. Geriatric trauma patients with SI greater than or equal to 1 should be transferred to a Level 1 trauma center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662879     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  22 in total

1.  Impact of frailty and anticoagulation status on readmission and mortality rates following falls in patients over 80.

Authors:  Chad Hall; Shannon Essler; Jad Dandashi; Matthew Corrigan; Yolanda Muñoz-Maldonado; Andrew Juergens; Scott Wieters; Dorian Drigalla; Justin L Regner
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-03-21

2.  Massive Transfusion: The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score.

Authors:  Bellal Joseph; Muhammad Khan; Michael Truitt; Faisal Jehan; Narong Kulvatunyou; Asad Azim; Arpana Jain; Muhammad Zeeshan; Andrew Tang; Terence O'Keeffe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Shock Index Is a Validated Prediction Tool for the Short-Term Survival of Advanced Cancer Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Zhong Ning Leonard Goh; Mu-Wei Chen; Hao-Tsai Cheng; Kuang-Hung Hsu; Chen-Ken Seak; Joanna Chen-Yeen Seak; Seng Kit Ling; Shao-Feng Liao; Tzu-Heng Cheng; Yi-Da Sie; Chih-Huang Li; Hsien-Yi Chen; Cheng-Yu Chien; Chen-June Seak
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 4.  Shock index as a predictor for mortality in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Malene Vang; Maria Østberg; Jacob Steinmetz; Lars S Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system.

Authors:  Spencer C H Kuo; Pao-Jen Kuo; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Systolic Blood Pressure Lower than Heart Rate upon Arrival at and Departure from the Emergency Department Indicates a Poor Outcome for Adult Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Wei-Hung Lai; Shao-Chun Wu; Cheng-Shyuan Rau; Pao-Jen Kuo; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Yi-Chun Chen; Hsiao-Yun Hsieh; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrolled haemorrahgic shock as an adjunct to haemostatic procedures in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Junya Tsurukiri; Itsurou Akamine; Takao Sato; Masatsugu Sakurai; Eitaro Okumura; Mariko Moriya; Hiroshi Yamanaka; Shoichi Ohta
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Severe trauma in the geriatric population.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou; Jon Pérez-Bárcena; Mario Chico-Fernández; Marcelino Sánchez-Casado; Joan Maria Raurich
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-05-04

Review 9.  Emergency surgery in the elderly: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Andrew D W Torrance; Susan L Powell; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-08

10.  Validation of the Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index for Predicting Mortality of Geriatric Trauma Patients in Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Soon Yong Kim; Ki Jeong Hong; Sang Do Shin; Young Sun Ro; Ki Ok Ahn; Yu Jin Kim; Eui Jung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.