| Literature DB >> 24662769 |
Mohamed Barkallah1, Yaakoub Gharbi1, Amal Ben Hassena1, Ahlem Ben Slima1, Zouhir Mallek2, Michel Gautier3, Gilbert Greub4, Radhouane Gdoura1, Imen Fendri5.
Abstract
Bovine abortion of unknown infectious etiology still remains a major economic problem. Thus, we investigated whether Brucella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp. and Coxiella burnetii are associated with abortion and/or stillbirth in Tunisian dairy cattle. Using a pan-Chlamydiales PCR, we also investigated the role of Chlamydiaceae, Waddlia chondrophila, Parachlamydia acanthamoebae and other members of the Chlamydiales order in this setting. Veterinary samples taken from mid to late-term abortions from twenty dairy herds were tested. From a total of 150 abortion cases collected, infectious agents were detected by PCR in 73 (48.66%) cases, 13 (8.66%) of which represented co-infections with two infectious agents. Detected pathogens include Brucella spp (31.3%), Chlamydiaceae (4.66%), Waddlia chondrophila (8%), Parachlamydia acanthamoebae (5.33%), Listeria monocytogenes (4.66%) and Salmonella spp. (3.33%). In contrast, Campylobacter spp. and Coxiella burnetii DNA were not detected among the investigated veterinary samples. This demonstrates that different bacterial agents may cause bovine abortion in Tunisia. This is the first report suggesting the role of Parachlamydia acanthamoebae in bovine abortion in Africa. Further studies with a larger number of samples are necessary to confirm whether this emerging pathogen is directly linked to abortion in cattle.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24662769 PMCID: PMC3963856 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sequences of primers and probes used in the study.
| Name | Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Product size (bp) | Reference | |
|
| IS711-F |
| 63 | This study |
| IS711-R |
| |||
| IS711-P | HEX- | |||
|
| panCh16F2 |
| 207 to 215 | Lienard et al., 2011 |
| panCh16R2 |
| |||
| panCh16S | FAM- | |||
|
| invA-F |
| 243 | This study |
| invA-R |
| |||
|
| hly-F |
| 63 | This study |
| Hly-R |
| |||
|
| IS1111-F |
| 201 | This study |
| IS1111-R |
| |||
|
| Camp16SF |
| 108 | This study |
| Camp16SR |
|
Details of cases positive for Brucella abortus.
| Number of positive cases | Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT) | Real-time PCR | ||
| Vaginal swab samples | Milk samples | |||
|
| 21 | + | + | + |
| 25 | + | + | − | |
| 1 | + | − | − | |
|
| 5 | + | − | − |
+ positive/ − negative.
The association of abortion with positive results for different agents and frequencies of positive results between vaginal and milk samples.
| Tests | Cases (n = 150) | Controls (n = 64) | Odds Ratio 95% CI | P value |
|
| 47 (31.3%) | 5 (7.81%) | OR 5.38 (2.02–14.29) | <0.0001 |
|
| 46 (30.6%) | 0 | OR 57.4 (3.47–948.3) | <0.0001 |
|
| 27 (18%) | 0 | OR 28.7 (1.72–478.9) | <0.0001 |
|
| 7 (4.6%) | 0 | OR 6.74 (0.37–119.9) | 0.0796 |
|
| 5 (3.3%) | 0 | OR 4.87 (0.26–89.5) | 0.1658 |
The association of abortion with positive results for different agents by real-time PCR and frequencies of positive results between vaginal and milk samples were assessed using the Fisher's exact test. A p value<0.05 was taken as a level of significance. Cases: cows with clinical signs, controls: cows with normal pregnancies and normal parturitions, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
Figure 1Correlation between real-time PCR and the RBPT results.
The mean Ct-value of samples negative for Brucella (5.95) was significantly lower than that of samples with a strong reaction results (24.71), which is lower than that of samples with a weak reaction (34.61) (p<0,0001).
Sequencing results of vaginal swab samples positive with the pan-Chlamydiales PCR.
| Animal no. | Age (years) | Other information | Other etiology | Ct values (mean values) | % 16S rRNA gene homology with most similar GenBank sequence (corresponding family) |
|
| 2 | Abortion, fever, loss of appetite, diarrhea |
| 28.34 | 99% |
|
| 2 | Abortion, fever, diarrhea | 34.91 | 99% | |
|
| 3 | Abortion, fever, weakness, diarrhea | 34.91 |
| |
|
| 2 | Abortion, fever, diarrhea |
| 35.72 | 99% |
|
| 2 | Abortion | 31.8 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion |
| 34.52 | 99% |
|
| 2 | Abortion, fever, diarrhea | 35.22 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion, fever, diarrhea | 35.64 | 99% | |
|
| 4 | Abortion, fatigue |
| 19.97 | 99% |
|
| 3 | Abortion, respiratory disease |
| 22.91 | 99% Chlamydia abortus |
|
| 4 | Abortion | 25.4 | 99% Chlamydia abotus | |
|
| 2 | Abortion |
| 25.64 | 99% Chlamydia abortus |
|
| 2 | Abortion, diarrhea, fatigue | 27.79 | 99% | |
|
| 3 | Abortion | 31.66 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion, loss appetite | 34.52 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion |
| 32.88 | 99% |
|
| 2 | Abortion, fatigue | 35.49 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion, fever, loss appetite, weakness, diarrhea | 29.72 | 99% | |
|
| 3 | Abortion | 34.26 | 99% | |
|
| 3 | Abortion, respiratory diseases | 33.24 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion, diarrhea | 31.33 | 99% | |
|
| 3 | Abortion | 34.1 | 99% | |
|
| 3 | Abortion |
| 36.1 | 99% |
|
| 4 | Abortion, fever, loss appetite | 31.97 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion | 34.62 | 99% | |
|
| 2 | Abortion | 33.83 | 99% | |
|
| 4 | Abortion, fever, diarrhea | 32.84 | 99% |
*These results were previously published by Barkallah et al. (2013).
The number of samples positive for each pair of pathogens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 47 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |