| Literature DB >> 24661552 |
Ramsey N Majzoub1, Chia-Ling Chan2, Kai K Ewert1, Bruno F B Silva3, Keng S Liang4, Erica L Jacovetty5, Bridget Carragher5, Clinton S Potter5, Cyrus R Safinya6.
Abstract
Steric stabilization of cationic liposome-DNA (CL-DNA) complexes is required for in vivo applications such as gene therapy. PEGylation (PEG: poly(ethylene glycol)) of CL-DNA complexes by addition of PEG2000-lipids yields sterically stabilized nanoparticles but strongly reduces their gene delivery efficacy. PEGylation-induced weakening of the electrostatic binding of CL-DNA nanoparticles to cells (leading to reduced uptake) has been considered as a possible cause, but experimental results have been ambiguous. Using quantitative live-cell imaging in vitro, we have investigated cell attachment and uptake of PEGylated CL-DNA nanoparticles with and without a custom synthesized RGD-peptide grafted to the distal ends of PEG2000-lipids. The RGD-tagged nanoparticles exhibit strongly increased cellular attachment as well as uptake compared to nanoparticles without grafted peptide. Transfection efficiency of RGD-tagged PEGylated CL-DNA NPs increases by about an order of magnitude between NPs with low and high membrane charge density (σM; the average charge per unit area of the membrane; controlled by the molar ratio of cationic to neutral lipid), even though imaging data show that uptake of RGD-tagged particles is only slightly enhanced by high σM. This suggests that endosomal escape and, as a result, transfection efficiency of RGD-tagged NPs is facilitated by high σM. We present a model describing the interactions between PEGylated CL-DNA nanoparticles and the anionic cell membrane which shows how the PEG grafting density and membrane charge density affect adhesion of nanoparticles to the cell surface.Entities:
Keywords: Gene therapy; Liposome; Live cell imaging; Nanoparticle; Polyethylene glycol; RGD peptide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24661552 PMCID: PMC4032065 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomaterials ISSN: 0142-9612 Impact factor: 12.479