Literature DB >> 24661508

Animal reactions to oncoming vehicles: a conceptual review.

Steven L Lima1, Bradley F Blackwell, Travis L DeVault, Esteban Fernández-Juricic.   

Abstract

Animal-vehicle collisions (AVCs) are a substantial problem in a human-dominated world, but little is known about what goes wrong, from the animal's perspective, when a collision occurs with an automobile, boat, or aircraft. Our goal is to provide insight into reactions of animals to oncoming vehicles when collisions might be imminent. Avoiding a collision requires successful vehicle detection, threat assessment, and evasive behaviour; failures can occur at any of these stages. Vehicle detection seems fairly straightforward in many cases, but depends critically on the sensory capabilities of a given species. Sensory mechanisms for detection of collisions (looming detectors) may be overwhelmed by vehicle speed. Distractions are a likely problem in vehicle detection, but have not been clearly demonstrated in any system beyond human pedestrians. Many animals likely perceive moving vehicles as non-threatening, and may generally be habituated to their presence. Slow or minimal threat assessment is thus a likely failure point in many AVCs, but this is not uniformly evident. Animals generally initiate evasive behaviour when a collision appears imminent, usually employing some aspect of native antipredator behaviour. Across taxa, animals exhibit a variety of behaviours when confronted with oncoming vehicles. Among marine mammals, right whales Eubalaena spp., manatees Trichechus spp., and dugongs Dugong dugon are fairly unresponsive to approaching vehicles, suggesting a problem in threat assessment. Others, such as dolphins Delphinidae, assess vehicle approach at distance. Little work has been conducted on the behavioural aspects of AVCs involving large mammals and automobiles, despite their prevalence. Available observations suggest that birds do not usually treat flying aircraft as a major threat, often allowing close approach before taking evasive action, as they might in response to natural predators. Inappropriate antipredator behaviour (often involving immobility) is a major source of AVCs in amphibians and terrestrial reptiles. Much behavioural work on AVCs remains to be done across a wide variety of taxa. Such work should provide broad phylogenetic generalizations regarding AVCs and insights into managing AVCs. Published 2014. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal-object collisions; animal-vehicle collisions; antipredator behaviour; avoidance; sensory; wildlife strikes

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661508     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  14 in total

1.  Speed kills: ineffective avian escape responses to oncoming vehicles.

Authors:  Travis L DeVault; Bradley F Blackwell; Thomas W Seamans; Steven L Lima; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  When hawks attack: animal-borne video studies of goshawk pursuit and prey-evasion strategies.

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Andrew H Fulton; Lee J Rosenthal
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  White-tailed deer response to vehicle approach: evidence of unclear and present danger.

Authors:  Bradley F Blackwell; Thomas W Seamans; Travis L DeVault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Temporal patterns in road crossing behaviour in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) at sites with wildlife warning reflectors.

Authors:  Jim-Lino Kämmerle; Falko Brieger; Max Kröschel; Robert Hagen; Ilse Storch; Rudi Suchant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Human recreation affects spatio-temporal habitat use patterns in red deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  Joy Coppes; Friedrich Burghardt; Robert Hagen; Rudi Suchant; Veronika Braunisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány; Susanne Jenni-Eiermann; Nicolas Strebel; Thomas Sattler; Juan José Negro; Zulima Tablado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Animal learning may contribute to both problems and solutions for wildlife-train collisions.

Authors:  Colleen Cassady St Clair; Jonathan Backs; Alyssa Friesen; Aditya Gangadharan; Patrick Gilhooly; Maureen Murray; Sonya Pollock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Social information affects Canada goose alert and escape responses to vehicle approach: implications for animal-vehicle collisions.

Authors:  Bradley F Blackwell; Thomas W Seamans; Travis L DeVault; Steven L Lima; Morgan B Pfeiffer; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Railway mortality for several mammal species increases with train speed, proximity to water, and track curvature.

Authors:  Colleen Cassady St Clair; Jesse Whittington; Anne Forshner; Aditya Gangadharan; David N Laskin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Daytime driving decreases amphibian roadkill.

Authors:  Wenyan Zhang; Guocheng Shu; Yulong Li; Shan Xiong; Chunping Liang; Cheng Li
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.