David E Cantonwine1, Zhen Zhang2, Kevin Rosenblatt3, Kevin S Goudy4, Robert C Doss4, Alan M Ezrin4, Gail Page4, Brian Brohman4, Thomas F McElrath5. 1. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. Electronic address: dcantonwine@partners.org. 2. Center for Biomarker Discovery and Translation, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. 3. Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health at Houston, Houston, TX. 4. NX Prenatal Inc, Louisville, KY. 5. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The analysis of circulating microparticles in pregnancy is of revolutionary potential because it represents an in vivo biopsy of active gestational tissues. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that circulating microparticle signaling will differ in pregnancies that experience spontaneous preterm birth from those delivering at term and that these differences will be evident many weeks in advance of clinical presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Utilizing plasma specimens obtained between 10 and 12 weeks' gestation as part of a prospectively collected birth cohort in which pregnancy outcomes are independently validated by 2 board-certified maternal-fetal medicine physicians, 25 singleton cases of spontaneous preterm birth ≤ 34 weeks were matched by maternal age, race, and gestational age of sampling (±2 weeks) with 50 uncomplicated term deliveries. Circulating microparticles from these first-trimester specimens were isolated and analyzed by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for potential protein biomarkers following previous studies. Markers with robust univariate performance in correlating spontaneous preterm birth were further evaluated for their biological relevance via a combined functional profiling/pathway analysis and for multivariate performance. RESULTS: Among the 132 proteins evaluated, 62 demonstrated robust power of detecting spontaneous preterm birth in a bootstrap receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis at a false discovery rate of < 20% estimated via label permutation. Differential dependency network analysis identified spontaneous preterm birth-associated coexpression patterns linked to biological processes of inflammation, wound healing, and the coagulation cascade. Linear modeling of spontaneous preterm birth using a multiplex of the candidate biomarkers with a fixed sensitivity of 80% exhibited a specificity of 83% with median area under the curve of 0.89. These results indicate a strong potential of multivariate model development for informative risk stratification. CONCLUSION: This project has identified functional proteomic factors with associated biological processes that are already unique in their expression profiles at 10-12 weeks among women who go on to deliver spontaneously ≤ 34 weeks. These changes, with further validation, will allow the stratification of patients at risk of spontaneous preterm birth before clinical presentation.
BACKGROUND: The analysis of circulating microparticles in pregnancy is of revolutionary potential because it represents an in vivo biopsy of active gestational tissues. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that circulating microparticle signaling will differ in pregnancies that experience spontaneous preterm birth from those delivering at term and that these differences will be evident many weeks in advance of clinical presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Utilizing plasma specimens obtained between 10 and 12 weeks' gestation as part of a prospectively collected birth cohort in which pregnancy outcomes are independently validated by 2 board-certified maternal-fetal medicine physicians, 25 singleton cases of spontaneous preterm birth ≤ 34 weeks were matched by maternal age, race, and gestational age of sampling (±2 weeks) with 50 uncomplicated term deliveries. Circulating microparticles from these first-trimester specimens were isolated and analyzed by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for potential protein biomarkers following previous studies. Markers with robust univariate performance in correlating spontaneous preterm birth were further evaluated for their biological relevance via a combined functional profiling/pathway analysis and for multivariate performance. RESULTS: Among the 132 proteins evaluated, 62 demonstrated robust power of detecting spontaneous preterm birth in a bootstrap receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis at a false discovery rate of < 20% estimated via label permutation. Differential dependency network analysis identified spontaneous preterm birth-associated coexpression patterns linked to biological processes of inflammation, wound healing, and the coagulation cascade. Linear modeling of spontaneous preterm birth using a multiplex of the candidate biomarkers with a fixed sensitivity of 80% exhibited a specificity of 83% with median area under the curve of 0.89. These results indicate a strong potential of multivariate model development for informative risk stratification. CONCLUSION: This project has identified functional proteomic factors with associated biological processes that are already unique in their expression profiles at 10-12 weeks among women who go on to deliver spontaneously ≤ 34 weeks. These changes, with further validation, will allow the stratification of patients at risk of spontaneous preterm birth before clinical presentation.
Authors: T F McElrath; J L Hecht; O Dammann; K Boggess; A Onderdonk; G Markenson; M Harper; E Delpapa; E N Allred; A Leviton Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Joanne Katz; Anne Cc Lee; Naoko Kozuki; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Hannah Blencowe; Majid Ezzati; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Tanya Marchant; Barbara A Willey; Linda Adair; Fernando Barros; Abdullah H Baqui; Parul Christian; Wafaie Fawzi; Rogelio Gonzalez; Jean Humphrey; Lieven Huybregts; Patrick Kolsteren; Aroonsri Mongkolchati; Luke C Mullany; Richard Ndyomugyenyi; Jyh Kae Nien; David Osrin; Dominique Roberfroid; Ayesha Sania; Christentze Schmiegelow; Mariangela F Silveira; James Tielsch; Anjana Vaidya; Sithembiso C Velaphi; Cesar G Victora; Deborah Watson-Jones; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Augustine Rajakumar; Ana Sofia Cerdeira; Sarosh Rana; Zsuzsanna Zsengeller; Lia Edmunds; Arun Jeyabalan; Carl A Hubel; Isaac E Stillman; Samir M Parikh; S Ananth Karumanchi Journal: Hypertension Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: C Luke Dixon; Samantha Sheller-Miller; George R Saade; Stephen J Fortunato; Andrew Lai; Carlos Palma; Dominic Guanzon; Carlos Salomon; Ramkumar Menon Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Larry Rand; Bruce Bedell; Rebecca J Baer; Scott P Oltman; Mary E Norton; Gary M Shaw; David K Stevenson; Jeffrey C Murray; Kelli K Ryckman Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.225