| Literature DB >> 24661055 |
Calvin K Lai1, Maddalena Marini2, Steven A Lehr3, Carlo Cerruti3, Jiyun-Elizabeth L Shin4, Jennifer A Joy-Gaba5, Arnold K Ho6, Bethany A Teachman1, Sean P Wojcik7, Spassena P Koleva8, Rebecca S Frazier1, Larisa Heiphetz9, Eva E Chen10, Rhiannon N Turner11, Jonathan Haidt12, Selin Kesebir13, Carlee Beth Hawkins1, Hillary S Schaefer1, Sandro Rubichi14, Giuseppe Sartori15, Christopher M Dial3, N Sriram1, Mahzarin R Banaji3, Brian A Nosek1.
Abstract
Many methods for reducing implicit prejudice have been identified, but little is known about their relative effectiveness. We held a research contest to experimentally compare interventions for reducing the expression of implicit racial prejudice. Teams submitted 17 interventions that were tested an average of 3.70 times each in 4 studies (total N = 17,021), with rules for revising interventions between studies. Eight of 17 interventions were effective at reducing implicit preferences for Whites compared with Blacks, particularly ones that provided experience with counterstereotypical exemplars, used evaluative conditioning methods, and provided strategies to override biases. The other 9 interventions were ineffective, particularly ones that engaged participants with others' perspectives, asked participants to consider egalitarian values, or induced a positive emotion. The most potent interventions were ones that invoked high self-involvement or linked Black people with positivity and White people with negativity. No intervention consistently reduced explicit racial preferences. Furthermore, intervention effectiveness only weakly extended to implicit preferences for Asians and Hispanics. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24661055 DOI: 10.1037/a0036260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Psychol Gen ISSN: 0022-1015