Literature DB >> 24661055

Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions.

Calvin K Lai1, Maddalena Marini2, Steven A Lehr3, Carlo Cerruti3, Jiyun-Elizabeth L Shin4, Jennifer A Joy-Gaba5, Arnold K Ho6, Bethany A Teachman1, Sean P Wojcik7, Spassena P Koleva8, Rebecca S Frazier1, Larisa Heiphetz9, Eva E Chen10, Rhiannon N Turner11, Jonathan Haidt12, Selin Kesebir13, Carlee Beth Hawkins1, Hillary S Schaefer1, Sandro Rubichi14, Giuseppe Sartori15, Christopher M Dial3, N Sriram1, Mahzarin R Banaji3, Brian A Nosek1.   

Abstract

Many methods for reducing implicit prejudice have been identified, but little is known about their relative effectiveness. We held a research contest to experimentally compare interventions for reducing the expression of implicit racial prejudice. Teams submitted 17 interventions that were tested an average of 3.70 times each in 4 studies (total N = 17,021), with rules for revising interventions between studies. Eight of 17 interventions were effective at reducing implicit preferences for Whites compared with Blacks, particularly ones that provided experience with counterstereotypical exemplars, used evaluative conditioning methods, and provided strategies to override biases. The other 9 interventions were ineffective, particularly ones that engaged participants with others' perspectives, asked participants to consider egalitarian values, or induced a positive emotion. The most potent interventions were ones that invoked high self-involvement or linked Black people with positivity and White people with negativity. No intervention consistently reduced explicit racial preferences. Furthermore, intervention effectiveness only weakly extended to implicit preferences for Asians and Hispanics. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661055     DOI: 10.1037/a0036260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  56 in total

1.  Model-free and model-based learning processes in the updating of explicit and implicit evaluations.

Authors:  Benedek Kurdi; Samuel J Gershman; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mnemonic convergence in social networks: The emergent properties of cognition at a collective level.

Authors:  Alin Coman; Ida Momennejad; Rae D Drach; Andra Geana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The base rate principle and the fairness principle in social judgment.

Authors:  Jack Cao; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Value of Interracial Contact for Reducing Anti-Black Bias Among Non-Black Physicians: A Cognitive Habits and Growth Evaluation (CHANGE) Study Report.

Authors:  Ivuoma N Onyeador; Natalie M Wittlin; Sara E Burke; John F Dovidio; Sylvia P Perry; Rachel R Hardeman; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Jeph Herrin; Sean M Phelan; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-11-19

5.  Access to common laparoscopic general surgical procedures: do racial disparities exist?

Authors:  Kasey Leigh Wood; Syed F Haider; Anthony Bui; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures.

Authors:  Patrick S Forscher; Calvin K Lai; Jordan R Axt; Charles R Ebersole; Michelle Herman; Patricia G Devine; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-06-13

7.  The Experience of Racism on Behavioral Health Outcomes: The Moderating Impact of Mindfulness.

Authors:  Tamika C B Zapolski; Micah T Faidley; Marcy Beutlich
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2018-06-04

8.  Social robotics and the modulation of social perception and bias.

Authors:  Joshua Skewes; David M Amodio; Johanna Seibt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Breaking the prejudice habit: Mechanisms, timecourse, and longevity.

Authors:  Patrick S Forscher; Chelsea Mitamura; Emily L Dix; William T L Cox; Patricia G Devine
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2017-05-11

10.  Age Differences in Explicit and Implicit Age Attitudes Across the Life Span.

Authors:  William J Chopik; Hannah L Giasson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.