Literature DB >> 24660725

Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions.

Chris Sungwon Chung1, Catherine S Giess, Eva C Gombos, Elisabeth P Frost, Eren D Yeh, Sughra Raza, Robyn L Birdwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the patient compliance with and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral mammography in surveillance of probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study identified lesions prospectively classified BI-RADS 3 in asymptomatic women from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2008. Surveillance protocol for BI-RADS 3 lesions included 6-month (unilateral), 12-month (bilateral), 18-month (unilateral), and 24-month (bilateral) imaging, with subsequent annual screening. Demographics, surveillance data, BI-RADS upgrades and downgrades, and biopsy results were abstracted from the longitudinal medical record.
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred eighty-eight lesions in 1077 patients (mean age, 51.5 years; age range, 26-89 years) had BI-RADS 3 assessment, representing 1.07% of all screening examinations. The compliance rates for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 83.3%, 75.9%, 54.8%, and 53.9%, respectively. Sixty lesions were upgraded to BI-RADS 4 or 5 during surveillance. Biopsy revealed 15 cancers (cancer yield of 1.47%) from 1017 lesions with either 24-month imaging stability or tissue diagnosis available. Five, six, one, and three cancers were detected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Cancers were all stage 0 or 1 except for one stage 2A cancer. Seven hundred forty-four of 1188 (62.6%) BI-RADS 3 lesions were downgraded before completing 2-year surveillance.
CONCLUSION: Most (11/15 [73%]) breast cancers initially assessed as BI-RADS 3 are diagnosed at up to 12 months' surveillance. Eighteen-month unilateral mammography performed as BI-RADS 3 surveillance contributes minimally to cancer detection and has poor patient compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24660725     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Management for BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected in preoperative breast MR imaging of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Nariya Cho; Soo-Yeon Kim; Hye Ryoung Koo; Mirinae Seo; Ajung Chu; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Anne Marie McCarthy; Susan P Weinstein; Mitchell D Schnall; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Value of BI-RADS 3 Audits.

Authors:  Prithwijit Roychowdhury; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; John Roubil; Imani M Williams; Efaza Siddiqui; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Biomed J Sci Tech Res       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 4.  BI-RADS 3 Assessment on MRI: A Lesion-Based Review for Breast Radiologists.

Authors:  Derek L Nguyen; Kelly S Myers; Eniola Oluyemi; Lisa A Mullen; Babita Panigrahi; Joanna Rossi; Emily B Ambinder
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 5.  BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign.

Authors:  Karen A Lee; Nishi Talati; Rebecca Oudsema; Sharon Steinberger; Laurie R Margolies
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-27

6.  The breast lesion excision system procedure: An optimal solution for the management of indeterminate BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions in women with severe anxiety.

Authors:  Semih Hot; Zafer Ü Coşkun; Adem Akçakaya; Ömer Bender; Ülkü A Türkmen; Pınar Ö Nayır; Ayhan Sarı; Ayşe B Hot
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Factors Associated With Optimal Follow-up in Women With BI-RADS 3 Breast Findings.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Aijia Wang; Laila Cochon; Catherine Giess; Sonali Desai; Sunil Eappen; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 5.532

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.