Literature DB >> 36247094

BI-RADS 3 Assessment on MRI: A Lesion-Based Review for Breast Radiologists.

Derek L Nguyen1, Kelly S Myers1, Eniola Oluyemi1, Lisa A Mullen1, Babita Panigrahi1, Joanna Rossi1, Emily B Ambinder1.   

Abstract

Unlike mammography and US, limited data exist to establish well-defined criteria for MRI findings that have a ≤2% likelihood of malignancy. Therefore, determining which findings are appropriate for a BI-RADS 3 assessment on MRI remains challenging and variable among breast radiologists. Emerging data suggest that BI-RADS 3 should be limited to baseline MRI examinations (or examinations with less than two years of prior comparisons) performed for high-risk screening and only used for masses with all of the typical morphological and kinetic features suggestive of a fibroadenoma or dominant enhancing T2 hypointense foci that is distinct from background parenchymal enhancement and without suspicious kinetics. This article presents an updated discussion of BI-RADS 3 assessment (probably benign) for breast MRI using current evidence. © Society of Breast Imaging 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BI-RADS 3; breast MRI; probably benign

Year:  2022        PMID: 36247094      PMCID: PMC9549780          DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Imaging        ISSN: 2631-6110


  66 in total

1.  Management for BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected in preoperative breast MR imaging of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Nariya Cho; Soo-Yeon Kim; Hye Ryoung Koo; Mirinae Seo; Ajung Chu; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Computer Aided Detection (CAD) for breast MRI.

Authors:  Chris Wood
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-02

3.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.

Authors:  Mitchell D Schnall; Jeffrey Blume; David A Bluemke; Gia A DeAngelis; Nanette DeBruhl; Steven Harms; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Nola Hylton; Christiane K Kuhl; Etta D Pisano; Petrina Causer; Stuart J Schnitt; David Thickman; Carol B Stelling; Paul T Weatherall; Constance Lehman; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Patterns of nonmasslike enhancement at screening breast MR imaging of high-risk premenopausal women.

Authors:  Catherine S Giess; Sughra Raza; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors.

Authors:  Jeong-Ah Kim; Eun Ju Son; Ji Hyun Youk; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Joon Jeong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The diverse pathology and kinetics of mass, nonmass, and focus enhancement on MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Akiko Shimauchi; Lindsay Zak; Xiaobing Fan; Gregory S Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  MRI appearance of invasive subcentimetre breast carcinoma: benign characteristics are common.

Authors:  Matthias Meissnitzer; D David Dershaw; Kimberly Feigin; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Filipe Barra; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; D David Dershaw; Andrea F Abramson; Lee K Tan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; Cathleen M Kim; Jennifer B Kaplan; Andrea F Abramson; Jennifer H Menell; Kimberly J Van Zee; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.

Authors:  Christopher E Comstock; Constantine Gatsonis; Gillian M Newstead; Bradley S Snyder; Ilana F Gareen; Jennifer T Bergin; Habib Rahbar; Janice S Sung; Christina Jacobs; Jennifer A Harvey; Mary H Nicholson; Robert C Ward; Jacqueline Holt; Andrew Prather; Kathy D Miller; Mitchell D Schnall; Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 157.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.