Literature DB >> 24659829

UNIFORMLY MOST POWERFUL BAYESIAN TESTS.

Valen E Johnson1.   

Abstract

Uniformly most powerful tests are statistical hypothesis tests that provide the greatest power against a fixed null hypothesis among all tests of a given size. In this article, the notion of uniformly most powerful tests is extended to the Bayesian setting by defining uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests to be tests that maximize the probability that the Bayes factor, in favor of the alternative hypothesis, exceeds a specified threshold. Like their classical counterpart, uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests are most easily defined in one-parameter exponential family models, although extensions outside of this class are possible. The connection between uniformly most powerful tests and uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests can be used to provide an approximate calibration between p-values and Bayes factors. Finally, issues regarding the strong dependence of resulting Bayes factors and p-values on sample size are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes factor; Higgs boson; Jeffreys–Lindley paradox; Neyman–Pearson lemma; nonlocal prior density; objective Bayes; one-parameter exponential family model; uniformly most powerful test

Year:  2013        PMID: 24659829      PMCID: PMC3960084          DOI: 10.1214/13-AOS1123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Stat        ISSN: 0090-5364            Impact factor:   4.028


  1 in total

1.  Bayesian Model Selection in High-Dimensional Settings.

Authors:  Valen E Johnson; David Rossell
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.033

  1 in total
  12 in total

1.  Revised standards for statistical evidence.

Authors:  Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.

Authors:  Valen E Johnson; Richard D Payne; Tianying Wang; Alex Asher; Soutrik Mandal
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence.

Authors:  Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A Powerful Bayesian Test for Equality of Means in High Dimensions.

Authors:  Roger S Zoh; Abhra Sarkar; Raymond J Carroll; Bani K Mallick
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Bayesian t-tests for correlations and partial correlations.

Authors:  Min Wang; Fang Chen; Tao Lu; Jianping Dong
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.416

6.  Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.

Authors:  Sandipan Pramanik; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  A Modified Sequential Probability Ratio Test.

Authors:  Sandipan Pramanik; Valen E Johnson; Anirban Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 1.387

8.  Confidence limits, error bars and method comparison in molecular modeling. Part 1: the calculation of confidence intervals.

Authors:  A Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p-values.

Authors:  David Colquhoun
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Per Winkel; Theis Lange; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.