PURPOSE: Germany has one of the highest age-adjusted mesothelioma mortality rates worldwide. As mesothelioma occurs ≥ 30 years after asbestos exposure, contemporary rates likely reflect exposures in the 1960-1970s. During this period, political division between West and East Germany led to differences regarding the import and consumption of asbestos. It is unclear whether mesothelioma rates also differ between these formerly separate countries which are now served by similar health and mortality reporting systems, thereby facilitating regional comparisons. METHODS: We examined regional, temporal, and sex variations in mesothelioma mortality rates in Germany in 2000-2010, collapsing the federal states into West Germany, East Germany, and Berlin. We calculated truncated (≥ 40 years) age-standardized mesothelioma mortality rates (ASRs(40+)) per 100,000 person-years, estimated sex-stratified mortality rate ratios (MRRs) (95 % confidence intervals (CIs)), adjusted for age and calendar year from Poisson models, and fitted age-period-cohort models. RESULTS: There were 12,854 mesothelioma deaths at ages ≥ 40 years in Germany during 2000-2010. ASRs(40+) were higher in West (males 4.4; females 0.8) than East (males 1.7; females 0.6) Germany. MRRs for West versus East Germany were 2.68 (95 % CI 2.48-2.88) among males and 1.42 (95 % CI 1.27-1.59) among females. In both regions, mortality rates increased for birth cohorts until the mid 1940s and subsequently declined. The country's peak mesothelioma burden is predicted to occur by 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Geographical differences in mesothelioma mortality rates are consistent with heterogeneous historical asbestos exposures. Differences may exist for other asbestos-related cancers and should be investigated in analytic studies with individual asbestos exposure information.
PURPOSE: Germany has one of the highest age-adjusted mesothelioma mortality rates worldwide. As mesothelioma occurs ≥ 30 years after asbestos exposure, contemporary rates likely reflect exposures in the 1960-1970s. During this period, political division between West and East Germany led to differences regarding the import and consumption of asbestos. It is unclear whether mesothelioma rates also differ between these formerly separate countries which are now served by similar health and mortality reporting systems, thereby facilitating regional comparisons. METHODS: We examined regional, temporal, and sex variations in mesothelioma mortality rates in Germany in 2000-2010, collapsing the federal states into West Germany, East Germany, and Berlin. We calculated truncated (≥ 40 years) age-standardized mesothelioma mortality rates (ASRs(40+)) per 100,000 person-years, estimated sex-stratified mortality rate ratios (MRRs) (95 % confidence intervals (CIs)), adjusted for age and calendar year from Poisson models, and fitted age-period-cohort models. RESULTS: There were 12,854 mesothelioma deaths at ages ≥ 40 years in Germany during 2000-2010. ASRs(40+) were higher in West (males 4.4; females 0.8) than East (males 1.7; females 0.6) Germany. MRRs for West versus East Germany were 2.68 (95 % CI 2.48-2.88) among males and 1.42 (95 % CI 1.27-1.59) among females. In both regions, mortality rates increased for birth cohorts until the mid 1940s and subsequently declined. The country's peak mesothelioma burden is predicted to occur by 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Geographical differences in mesothelioma mortality rates are consistent with heterogeneous historical asbestos exposures. Differences may exist for other asbestos-related cancers and should be investigated in analytic studies with individual asbestos exposure information.
Authors: Manuela Valenzuela; Margarita Giraldo; Sonia Gallo-Murcia; Juliana Pineda; Laura Santos; Juan Pablo Ramos-Bonilla Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2016-12
Authors: Georg Johnen; Katarzyna Gawrych; Irina Raiko; Swaantje Casjens; Beate Pesch; Daniel G Weber; Dirk Taeger; Martin Lehnert; Jens Kollmeier; Torsten Bauer; Arthur W Musk; Bruce W S Robinson; Thomas Brüning; Jenette Creaney Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Daniel G Weber; Katarzyna Gawrych; Swaantje Casjens; Alexander Brik; Martin Lehnert; Dirk Taeger; Beate Pesch; Jens Kollmeier; Torsten T Bauer; Georg Johnen; Thomas Brüning Journal: Dis Markers Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.434
Authors: Joachim Schüz; Igor Bukhtiyarov; Ann Olsson; Monika Moissonnier; Evgenia Ostroumova; Eleonora Feletto; Sara J Schonfeld; Graham Byrnes; Iraklii Tskhomariia; Valerie McCormack; Kurt Straif; Sergey Kashanskiy; Tatiana Morozova; Hans Kromhout; Evgeny Kovalevskiy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gisele Aparecida Fernandes; Eduardo Algranti; Gleice Margarete de Souza Conceição; Victor Wünsch Filho; Tatiana Natasha Toporcov Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Terri-Ann Berry; Elena Belluso; Ruggero Vigliaturo; Reto Gieré; Edward A Emmett; Joseph R Testa; Gregor Steinhorn; Shannon L Wallis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Carolina Mensi; Sara De Matteis; Barbara Dallari; Luciano Riboldi; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Dario Consonni Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 4.402