Literature DB >> 24658721

Design considerations and performance of MEMS acoustoelectric ultrasound detectors.

Zhaohui Wang, Pier Ingram, Charles L Greenlee, Ragnar Olafsson, Robert A Norwood, Russell S Witte.   

Abstract

Most single-element hydrophones depend on a piezoelectric material that converts pressure changes to electricity. These devices, however, can be expensive, susceptible to damage at high pressure, and/or have limited bandwidth and sensitivity. We have previously described the acoustoelectric (AE) hydrophone as an inexpensive alternative for mapping an ultrasound beam and monitoring acoustic exposure. The device exploits the AE effect, an interaction between electrical current flowing through a material and a propagating pressure wave. Previous designs required imprecise fabrication methods using common laboratory supplies, making it difficult to control basic features such as shape and size. This study describes a different approach based on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) processing that allows for much finer control of several design features. In an effort to improve the performance of the AE hydrophone, we combine simulations with bench-top testing to evaluate key design features, such as thickness, shape, and conductivity of the active and passive elements. The devices were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, frequency response, and accuracy for reproducing the beam pattern. Our simulations and experimental results both indicated that designs using a combination of indium tin oxide (ITO) for the active element and gold for the passive electrodes (conductivity ratio = ~20) produced the best result for mapping the beam of a 2.25-MHz ultrasound transducer. Also, the AE hydrophone with a rectangular dumbbell configuration achieved a better beam pattern than other shape configurations. Lateral and axial resolutions were consistent with images generated from a commercial capsule hydrophone. Sensitivity of the best-performing device was 1.52 nV/Pa at 500 kPa using a bias voltage of 20 V. We expect a thicker AE hydrophone closer to half the acoustic wavelength to produce even better sensitivity, while maintaining high spectral bandwidth for characterizing medical ultrasound transducers. AE ultrasound detectors may also be useful for monitoring acoustic exposure during therapy or as receivers for photoacoustic imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24658721      PMCID: PMC4048741          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  11 in total

1.  Probing the dynamics of tissue at low frequencies with the radiation force of ultrasound.

Authors:  M Fatemi; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Four-dimensional ultrasound current source density imaging of a dipole field.

Authors:  Z H Wang; R Olafsson; P Ingram; Q Li; Y Qin; R S Witte
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Acoustic field of a ballistic shock wave therapy device.

Authors:  Robin O Cleveland; Parag V Chitnis; Scott R McClure
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Inexpensive Acoustoelectric Hydrophone For Mapping High Intensity Ultrasonic Fields.

Authors:  Russell S Witte; Tim Hall; Ragner Olafsson; Sheng-Wen Huang; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  A new design of light illumination scheme for deep tissue photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Zhaohui Wang; Seunghan Ha; Kang Kim
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Acoustic power measurement of medical ultrasonic probes using a strain gauge technique.

Authors:  V N Bindal; V R Singh; G Singh
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields.

Authors:  Jessica E Parsons; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Ultrasound current source density imaging.

Authors:  Ragnar Olafsson; Russell S Witte; Sheng-Wen Huang; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Cardiac activation mapping using ultrasound current source density imaging (UCSDI).

Authors:  Ragnar Olafsson; Russell S Witte; Congxian Jia; Sheng-Wen Huang; Kang Kim; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  1 in total

1.  Simulation-based validation for four- dimensional multi-channel ultrasound current source density imaging.

Authors:  Zhaohui Wang; Russell S Witte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.725

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.