Literature DB >> 24656553

Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.

Alicia T Luchowski1, Britta L Anderson2, Michael L Power2, Greta B Raglan2, Eve Espey3, Jay Schulkin4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) - the copper and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the single-rod implant - are safe and effective but account for a small proportion of contraceptive use by US women. This study examined obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, training, practice and beliefs regarding LARC methods.
DESIGN: A survey questionnaire was mailed to 3000 Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. After exclusions, 1221 eligible questionnaires were analyzed (45.8% response rate, accounting for exclusions).
RESULTS: Almost all obstetrician-gynecologists reported providing IUDs (95.8%). Most obstetrician-gynecologists reported requiring two or more visits for IUD insertion (86.9%). Respondents that reported IUD insertion in a single visit reported inserting a greater number of IUDs in the last year. About half reported offering the single-rod implant (51.3%). A total of 92.0% reported residency training on IUDs, and 50.8% reported residency training on implants. Residency training and physician age correlated with the number of IUDs inserted in the past year. A total of 59.6% indicated receiving continuing education on at least one LARC method in the past 2years. Recent continuing education was most strongly associated with implant insertion, and 31.7% of respondents cited lack of insertion training as a barrier.
CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to LARC provision could be reduced if more obstetrician-gynecologists received implant training and provided same-day IUD insertion. Continuing education will likely increase implant provision. IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that obstetrician-gynecologists generally offer IUDs, but fewer offer the single-rod contraceptive implant. Recent continuing education strongly predicted whether obstetrician-gynecologists inserted implants and was also associated with other practices that encourage LARC use.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraceptive implants; Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD); Long-acting reversible contraception; Obstetrician–Gynecologists; Same-day insertion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24656553     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  23 in total

1.  Healthcare Provider Attitudes Regarding Contraception for Women with Obesity.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Suzanne G Folger; Polly A Marchbanks; Michele G Mandel; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.

Authors:  Colleen P Judge-Golden; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Beatrice A Chen; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Health Care Provider Attitudes about the Safety of "Quick Start" Initiation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents.

Authors:  Isabel A Morgan; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 1.814

4.  Training contraceptive providers to offer intrauterine devices and implants in contraceptive care: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Kirsten M J Thompson; Corinne H Rocca; Lisa Stern; Johanna Morfesis; Suzan Goodman; Jody Steinauer; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Contraception After Delivery Among Publicly Insured Women in Texas: Use Compared With Preference.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kari White; Daniel A Powers; Chloe Dillaway; Amanda J Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Access to long-acting reversible contraception among US publicly funded health centers.

Authors:  Marta Bornstein; Marion Carter; Lauren Zapata; Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Policy change is not enough: engaging provider champions on immediate postpartum contraception.

Authors:  Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Debra J Kane; Rebekah E Gee; Lyn Kieltyka; Brittni N Frederiksen; Katharyn M Baca; Kristin M Rankin; David A Goodman; Charlan D Kroelinger; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Kirsten M J Thompson; Suzan Goodman; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Comparing long-acting reversible contraception insertion rates in women with Medicaid vs. private insurance in a clinic with a two-visit protocol.

Authors:  Tara M Higgins; Anne K Dougherty; Gary J Badger; Sarah H Heil
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Contraceptive Procedures in Internal Medicine Clinics and Resident Education: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Methods, Barriers, and Facilitators.

Authors:  Rachel S Casas; Christine A Prifti; Alexandra E Bachorik; Heather Stuckey; Mindy Sobota; Cynthia H Chuang; Carol S Weisman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.