Literature DB >> 24652691

Effect of obesity on outcomes of free autologous breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Mark V Schaverien1, Stephen J Mcculley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is rising in Western society. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the available evidence regarding the effect of obesity on outcomes of free autologous breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥ 30. Comparable data from observational studies was combined for pooled analysis and quality assessment of observational studies was performed.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 6,043 patients). Pooled data analysis demonstrated significantly higher prevalences of overall complications, recipient site complications overall, donor site complications overall, donors site wound infection, donor site seroma, abdominal bulge/hernia, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, recipient site delayed wound healing, and partial flap failure, in obese (BMI ≥ 30) compared with nonobese (BMI < 30) patients. A BMI of 40 was identified as a threshold at which the prevalence of complications became prohibitively high. No randomized-controlled trials were found and all studies had methodological weaknesses.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications in obese patients following free autologous breast reconstruction were higher than in their nonobese counterparts; however the majority of these complications were reported in the studies as being minor. Until better evidence is available this information will help when counseling patients.
© 2014 Crown Copyright.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24652691     DOI: 10.1002/micr.22244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  13 in total

1.  Should Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction Be Considered in Women Who Require Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy? A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Billig; Reshma Jagsi; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edward Buchel; Edwin G Wilkins; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Nikhil Sobti; Aadit Patel; Evan Matros; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph H Dayan; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Restoring Breast Volume in High BMI Patients: A Single-Center Review of Breast Reconstruction Using Hyperinflated Saline Implants.

Authors:  Milind D Kachare; Swapnil D Kachare; Bradley J Vivace; Omar Elfanagely; Brooke Barrow; Adam O'Toole; Alyssa M Simpson; Rachel Safeek; Joshua H Choo; Terry M McCurry; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-07-21

4.  The Impact of Race on Perioperative and Patient-Reported Outcomes following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sabine Oskar; Jonas A Nelson; Madeleine E V Hicks; Kenneth P Seier M S; Kay See Tan; Jacqueline J Chu; Scott West; Robert J Allen; Andrea V Barrio; Evan Matros; Anoushka M Afonso
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.169

5.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

Review 6.  Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Breast Reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Claire Temple-Oberle; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Mark Tan; John L Semple; Christiaan Schrag; Marcio Barreto; Phillip Blondeel; Jeremy Hamming; Joseph Dayan; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.169

7.  An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Effective.

Authors:  Arezoo Astanehe; Claire Temple-Oberle; Markus Nielsen; William de Haas; Robert Lindsay; Jennifer Matthews; David C McKenzie; Justin Yeung; Christiaan Schrag
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-18

Review 8.  The Impact of Obesity on Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Kyuwan Lee; Laura Kruper; Christina M Dieli-Conwright; Joanne E Mortimer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  The Impact of Delaying Breast Reconstruction on Patient Expectations and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Analysis Using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Alexander Morzycki; Joseph Corkum; Nadim Joukhadar; Osama Samargandi; Jason G Williams; Simon G Frank
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  Optimizing aesthetic outcomes for breast reconstruction in patients with significant macromastia or ptosis.

Authors:  Wojciech Dec
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2018-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.