B S Walker1, L M Shah2, A G Osborn2. 1. From the Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. brett.walker@imail.org. 2. From the Department of Radiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Calcified cerebral emboli are a rarely reported but devastating cause of stroke and may be the first manifestation of vascular or cardiac disease. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnosis, prevalence, imaging appearance, presumed embolic source, treatment, and outcome of patients with calcified cerebral emboli. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our radiology information system was searched for all CT scans by using keywords "calcified," "emboli," and their permutations. The radiology information system was also searched to identify all "stroke" CT reports to calculate the prevalence of calcified cerebral emboli. We also performed a MEDLINE search to identify all published case reports. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases were identified from our database, and 48 were cases reported from the literature. The middle cerebral artery was the site of 83% of calcified emboli. Presumed sources were calcific aortic stenosis (36%), carotid atherosclerotic plaque (30%), and mitral annular calcification (11%). Spontaneous embolism occurred in 86%. Surgical treatment was performed in 34% of patients. Sixty-four percent of the patients with calcified aortic stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement. Among those with identifiable arterial disease, 53% underwent endarterectomy. Forty-one percent of patients experienced at least 1 recurrent stroke. The prevalence of calcified cerebral emboli identified on stroke CT scans at our institution was 2.7%. Seventy-three percent of cases were correctly identified. Twenty-seven percent were misdiagnosed on initial interpretation, while 9% were overlooked on preliminary interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Calcified cerebral emboli are more common than previously assumed, are frequently overlooked or misinterpreted, affect clinical course when diagnosed, and carry substantial risk for recurrent stroke.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Calcified cerebral emboli are a rarely reported but devastating cause of stroke and may be the first manifestation of vascular or cardiac disease. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnosis, prevalence, imaging appearance, presumed embolic source, treatment, and outcome of patients with calcified cerebral emboli. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our radiology information system was searched for all CT scans by using keywords "calcified," "emboli," and their permutations. The radiology information system was also searched to identify all "stroke" CT reports to calculate the prevalence of calcified cerebral emboli. We also performed a MEDLINE search to identify all published case reports. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases were identified from our database, and 48 were cases reported from the literature. The middle cerebral artery was the site of 83% of calcified emboli. Presumed sources were calcific aortic stenosis (36%), carotid atherosclerotic plaque (30%), and mitral annular calcification (11%). Spontaneous embolism occurred in 86%. Surgical treatment was performed in 34% of patients. Sixty-four percent of the patients with calcified aortic stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement. Among those with identifiable arterial disease, 53% underwent endarterectomy. Forty-one percent of patients experienced at least 1 recurrent stroke. The prevalence of calcified cerebral emboli identified on stroke CT scans at our institution was 2.7%. Seventy-three percent of cases were correctly identified. Twenty-seven percent were misdiagnosed on initial interpretation, while 9% were overlooked on preliminary interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Calcified cerebral emboli are more common than previously assumed, are frequently overlooked or misinterpreted, affect clinical course when diagnosed, and carry substantial risk for recurrent stroke.
Authors: Waleed Brinjikji; Sharon Duffy; Anthony Burrows; Werner Hacke; David Liebeskind; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel; Adnan H Siddiqui; Pooja Khatri; Blaise Baxter; Raul Nogeuira; Matt Gounis; Tudor Jovin; David F Kallmes Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Charlie Chia-Tsong Hsu; Gigi Nga Chi Kwan; Sachintha Hapugoda; Michelle Craigie; Trevor William Watkins; E Mark Haacke Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2017-01-01
Authors: C J Maurer; T Dobrocky; F Joachimski; U Neuberger; T Demerath; A Brehm; A Cianfoni; B Gory; A Berlis; J Gralla; M A Möhlenbruch; K A Blackham; M N Psychogios; P Zickler; S Fischer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mingxue Jing; Joshua Y P Yeo; Staffan Holmin; Tommy Andersson; Fabian Arnberg; Paul Bhogal; Cunli Yang; Anil Gopinathan; Tian Ming Tu; Benjamin Yong Qiang Tan; Ching Hui Sia; Hock Luen Teoh; Prakash R Paliwal; Bernard P L Chan; Vijay Sharma; Leonard L L Yeo Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 3.649