Literature DB >> 24649531

The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories.

Antonia Thelen, Micah M Murray.   

Abstract

This review article summarizes evidence that multisensory experiences at one point in time have long-lasting effects on subsequent unisensory visual and auditory object recognition. The efficacy of single-trial exposure to task-irrelevant multisensory events is its ability to modulate memory performance and brain activity to unisensory components of these events presented later in time. Object recognition (either visual or auditory) is enhanced if the initial multisensory experience had been semantically congruent and can be impaired if this multisensory pairing was either semantically incongruent or entailed meaningless information in the task-irrelevant modality, when compared to objects encountered exclusively in a unisensory context. Processes active during encoding cannot straightforwardly explain these effects; performance on all initial presentations was indistinguishable despite leading to opposing effects with stimulus repetitions. Brain responses to unisensory stimulus repetitions differ during early processing stages (-100 ms post-stimulus onset) according to whether or not they had been initially paired in a multisensory context. Plus, the network exhibiting differential responses varies according to whether or not memory performance is enhanced or impaired. The collective findings we review indicate that multisensory associations formed via single-trial learning exert influences on later unisensory processing to promote distinct object representations that manifest as differentiable brain networks whose activity is correlated with memory performance. These influences occur incidentally, despite many intervening stimuli, and are distinguishable from the encoding/learning processes during the formation of the multisensory associations. The consequences of multisensory interactions that persist over time to impact memory retrieval and object discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24649531     DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multisens Res        ISSN: 2213-4794            Impact factor:   2.286


  12 in total

Review 1.  A multisensory perspective on object memory.

Authors:  Pawel J Matusz; Mark T Wallace; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations.

Authors:  Nienke van Atteveldt; Micah M Murray; Gregor Thut; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Categorical congruence facilitates multisensory associative learning.

Authors:  Elan Barenholtz; David J Lewkowicz; Meredith Davidson; Lauren Mavica
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

Review 4.  Multisensory Processes: A Balancing Act across the Lifespan.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; David J Lewkowicz; Amir Amedi; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Learning to associate auditory and visual stimuli: behavioral and neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; Ryan A Stevenson; Mark T Wallace; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Memorable Audiovisual Narratives Synchronize Sensory and Supramodal Neural Responses.

Authors:  Samantha S Cohen; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-10

7.  Semantic congruent audiovisual integration during the encoding stage of working memory: an ERP and sLORETA study.

Authors:  Yuanjun Xie; Yuanyuan Xu; Chen Bian; Min Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Voice over: Audio-visual congruency and content recall in the gallery setting.

Authors:  Merle T Fairhurst; Minnie Scott; Ophelia Deroy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multisensory Gains in Simple Detection Predict Global Cognition in Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Solange Denervaud; Edouard Gentaz; Pawel J Matusz; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Learning Styles and Vocabulary Acquisition in Second Language: How the Brain Learns.

Authors:  Manuela Macedonia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.