Literature DB >> 24648754

Population-based service mammography screening: the Icelandic experience.

Kristjan Sigurdsson1, Elínborg Jóna Olafsdóttir2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes the efficacy of the Icelandic population-based service mammography screening.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women aged 40-69 were invited for screening at 2-year intervals starting in November 1987. The study evaluates: (A) attendance and other screened performance parameters during 1998-2010; (B) trends in age-standardized and age-specific incidence rates during 1969-2010 and mortality rates during 1969-2010; and (C) distribution of risk factors and disease specific death rates according to mode of detection.
RESULTS: (A) In the age group of 40-69, the average 2-year attendance was 62%, recall rate was 4.1%, needle biopsy rate was 1.3%, surgery rate was 0.6%, invasive cancer rate was 0.4%, and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) rate was 0.06%. (B) The linear incidence trend after the start of screening decreased significantly in the age group 40-49, increased significantly in the age group 50-69, but decreased non-significantly in the age group 70-79. The decreased age-specific incidence in the 70-79 age group was, however, greater than the increased age-specific incidence at the ages 50-69. The mortality rate decreased 41% for all age groups and the linear mortality trend decreased significantly at ages 40-49, 50-69, and 70-79. In the age group 40-74 years, the age-specific mortality decreased by 6.9 cases per 2000 during a 10-year period. (C) Screen-detected women had significantly smaller tumors, more favorable tumor grade, fewer axillary metastases and, after correction for other risk factors, the likelihood of dying from cancer decreased 54% (hazard ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.31-0.69) for these patients compared to cases of nonparticipators.
CONCLUSION: The study results confirm acceptable rates of recalls and referrals for further diagnosis and treatment, and significantly decreased breast cancer mortality rate after starting screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; incidence; mammography; mode of detection; mortality; risk factors; screening

Year:  2013        PMID: 24648754      PMCID: PMC3929328          DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S44671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)        ISSN: 1179-1314


  28 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cancer: evaluating the evidence.

Authors:  T J Gates
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 2.  Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; William C Black
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Screening mammography--a long run for a short slide?

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet.

Authors:  Eugenio Paci
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway.

Authors:  Mette Kalager; Marvin Zelen; Frøydis Langmark; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort.

Authors:  Barbro Numan Hellquist; Stephen W Duffy; Shahin Abdsaleh; Lena Björneld; Pál Bordás; László Tabár; Bedrich Viták; Sophia Zackrisson; Lennarth Nyström; Håkan Jonsson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A case-control study to estimate the impact of the Icelandic population-based mammography screening program on breast cancer death.

Authors:  R Gabe; L Tryggvadóttir; B F Sigfússon; G H Olafsdóttir; K Sigurdsson; S W Duffy
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Anna Gavin; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-28
View more
  4 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.

Authors:  D B Kopans
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  More misinformation on breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 3.  Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level.

Authors:  Emma Altobelli; Leonardo Rapacchietta; Paolo Matteo Angeletti; Luca Barbante; Filippo Valerio Profeta; Roberto Fagnano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.109

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.