Literature DB >> 24648667

Cytological artifacts masquerading interpretation.

Khushboo Sahay1, Monica Mehendiratta1, Shweta Rehani1, Madhumani Kumra1, Rashi Sharma1, Priyanka Kardam1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytological artifacts are important to learn because an error in routine laboratory practice can bring out an erroneous result. AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of delayed fixation and morphological discrepancies created by deliberate addition of extraneous factors on the interpretation and/or diagnosis of an oral cytosmear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out using papanicolaou and hematoxylin and eosin-stained oral smears, 6 each from 66 volunteer dental students with deliberate variation in fixation delay timings, with and without changes in temperature, undue pressure while smear making and intentional addition of contaminants. The fixation delay at room temperature was carried out at an interval of every 30 minutes, 1 day and 1 week and was continued till the end of 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month, respectively. The temperature variations included 60 to 70°C and 3 to 4°C.
RESULTS: Light microscopically, the effect of delayed fixation at room temperature appeared first on cytoplasm followed by nucleus within the first 2 hours and on the 4(th) day, respectively, till complete cytoplasmic degeneration on the 23(rd) day. However, delayed fixation at variable temperature brought faster degenerative changes at higher temperature than lower temperature. Effect of extraneous factors revealed some interesting facts.
CONCLUSIONS: In order to justify a cytosmear interpretation, a cytologist must be well acquainted with delayed fixation-induced cellular changes and microscopic appearances of common contaminants so as to implicate better prognosis and therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifacts; contaminants; cytosmear; degeneration; delayed fixation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24648667      PMCID: PMC3945624          DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.126649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cytol        ISSN: 0970-9371            Impact factor:   1.000


  5 in total

1.  Facts about artefacts in diagnostic pathology.

Authors:  S K Pattari; P Dey
Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 0.740

2.  The consequence of delayed fixation on subsequent preservation of urine cells.

Authors:  Hussain G Ahmed; Murtada Am Tom
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2011-01

3.  Prevalence, identification and significance of fiber contaminants in cervical smears.

Authors:  K H van Hoeven; P K Bertolini
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

4.  Maltese cross: Starch artifact in oral cytology, divulged through polarized microscopy.

Authors:  Kiran Balasaheb Jadhav; Nidhi Gupta; Mujib Br Ahmed
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Anurag Gupta; Mamta Singh; Rahela Ibrahim
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 27.401

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Contaminants and Mimickers in Cytopathology.

Authors:  S Muzarath; Sonam S Nandyal; B J Bindu; C Narayana Murthy
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Binucleate Cells in Cytosmears: What do They Signify?

Authors:  Gayathri Priyadharshini; Manjiri Phansalkar; Moses Ambroise; Anita Ramdas
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The Need for Careful Data Collection for Pattern Recognition in Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Raphaël Marée
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-04-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.