Literature DB >> 22043372

The consequence of delayed fixation on subsequent preservation of urine cells.

Hussain G Ahmed, Murtada Am Tom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Degenerative changes caused by delays in urine preservation contribute to false-negative and false-positive interpretation of urothelial disease in cytology. The aim of this study is to assess whether the delay of fixation of urine samples makes any significant difference to urine cytology and morphology, and the limit of acceptability of delay for routine use in the hospital laboratory.
METHODS: Three cell collection fluids were evaluated by analyzing the preservation and degeneration of cells in urine samples. In this study, 50 voided urine specimens were taken at random from females complaining of vaginal discharge. Each specimen was divided into three sterile containers. The first was immediately centrifugated and the deposit was smeared onto a cleaned micro slide and immediately fixed into 95% ethyl alcohol for 15 minutes. The remaining two were prepared in the same manner, however, the second after two hours of collection and the third after four hours of collection. The degree of degeneration and thus the preservation were assessed by a table of chosen criteria, then ranked and analyzed using Friedman's nonparametric test, at p=0.05.
RESULTS: The results showed a significant difference between the preservation and the delay in urine fixation, p<0.0001.
CONCLUSION: Any delay in fixation of urine specimen for cytology affects the preservation of cells, which may result in miss diagnosis. It is recommended that urine samples for cytology should be fixed immediately after collection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Urine cells; fixation

Year:  2011        PMID: 22043372      PMCID: PMC3191613          DOI: 10.5001/omj.2011.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oman Med J        ISSN: 1999-768X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biology and management of bladder cancer.

Authors:  D Raghavan; W U Shipley; M B Garnick; P J Russell; J P Richie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Current practice of urinary bladder cytology.

Authors:  W J Frable; L Paxson; J A Barksdale; W W Koontz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Evaluation of urinary level of NMP22 as a diagnostic marker for stage pTa-pT1 bladder cancer: comparison with urinary cytology and BTA test.

Authors:  A Del Nero; N Esposito; A Currò; D Biasoni; E Montanari; B Mangiarotti; A Trinchieri; G Zanetti; M P Serrago; E Pisani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  New method for preserving cytology specimens.

Authors:  J McCorriston
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The role of urinary cytology for detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  B Planz; E Jochims; T Deix; H P Caspers; G Jakse; A Boecking
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 6.  Urine cytology. It is still the gold standard for screening?

Authors:  F M Brown
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Accuracy of urinary cytology in the diagnosis of primary and recurrent bladder cancer.

Authors:  H G Wiener; G P Vooijs; B van't Hof-Grootenboer
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Effect of contrast media on urinary cytopathology specimens.

Authors:  Sebastian Frees; Samir Bidnur; Michael Metcalfe; Peter Raven; Claudia Chavez-Munoz; Igor Moskalev; Ladan Fazli; Alan So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Urinary bladder cancer in yemen.

Authors:  Abdullah Saleh Al-Samawi; Saleh Mansoor Aulaqi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-09

3.  Cytological artifacts masquerading interpretation.

Authors:  Khushboo Sahay; Monica Mehendiratta; Shweta Rehani; Madhumani Kumra; Rashi Sharma; Priyanka Kardam
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Binucleate Cells in Cytosmears: What do They Signify?

Authors:  Gayathri Priyadharshini; Manjiri Phansalkar; Moses Ambroise; Anita Ramdas
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.