Literature DB >> 24648654

Effects of a Home Exercise Program on the Self-report Disability Index and Gait Parameters in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Eui-Ryong Kim1, Min-Hyeok Kang1, Yang-Gon Kim2, Jae-Seop Oh3.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The present study was performed to identify the effect of a home exercise program on the self-reported disability index and gait parameters in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). [Methods] Fifteen patients with LSS were enrolled in this study and were trained in a 4-week home exercise program (40 min/day). All patients were evaluated with three self-reported disability indices (Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Spinal Stenosis Scale), and gait parameters were assessed using a GAITRite system before and after the home exercise program.
[Results] Patients with LSS showed significant decreases in the self-reported questionnaire scores and pain intensity after the home exercise program. However, the gait parameters did not significantly change.
[Conclusion] These findings suggest that home exercise programs can improve self-reported questionnaire scores and decrease pain in patients with LSS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Home exercise; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Self-reported questionnaires

Year:  2014        PMID: 24648654      PMCID: PMC3944311          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20% of people older than 65 years suffer from low back problems1). In particular, lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent and disabling condition in the elderly population. The main symptoms are described as back and buttock pain and/or weakness, numbness, and neurologic claudication that is exacerbated by standing, backward bending, and walking2). To manage patients with LSS, decompressive laminectomy and fusion procedures are commonly recommended3). Katz et al.4) reported that surgical operations improve patients’ functional ability and that 60% to 80% of patients are satisfied. However, 4 years after spinal stenosis surgery, referred pain may develop, and severe impairment decreases the physical aspects of patients’ quality of life5). The most negative element of repeat surgery is its high cost6); the reoperation rate for patients with LSS is 5% to 23%7). Notably, 21 studies of predictors of postoperative clinical outcomes in LSS identified depression, cardiovascular comorbidities, walking inability, and poor subjective outcomes8). Conservative treatment such as therapeutic exercises may achieve clinical recovery, improvements in disability, reductions in pain, increased satisfaction, and better function among patients with chronic low back pain and LSS9), and many studies10) have investigated the effectiveness of conservative interventions (lumbar flexion exercises, stretching, and mobility exercises). However, the pain often recurs when the exercise program is discontinued. The recent increase in the aging population and rising incidence of chronic disease have led to higher medical expenses11), and policy makers are moving in the direction of self-management of chronic conditions12). Therefore, to effectively manage patients with LSS, a home exercise program may be needed. It has been reported that patients with LSS have an altered gait pattern due to symptom such as neurologic claudication13). Wide-based gait, slow walking, and short stride are often shown to alleviate neurologic claudication in patients with LSS13, 14). Although self-stretching of the hip flexors as a home exercise is recommended for pain-free gait in patients with LSS15), there is limited experimental evidence. Backstrom et al.15) argued that exercise is essential in the treatment of patients with LSS and suggested a specific self-exercise program. However, few studies have compared the effects of home exercise among community-dwelling patients with LSS. The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of a 4-week home exercise program in terms of how it affects self-reported questionnaire scores and gait parameters in community-dwelling patients with LSS.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All participants (nine females and six females, 68.2 ± 5.8 years of age, 61.93 ± 9.5 kg, 161.2 ± 8.3 cm) were diagnosed with degenerated LSS by physicians using magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. All participated in a health-promotion program in a community health center in Pusan, South Korea. The inclusion criteria were 1) age of 55 years or more; 2) pain in the low back, buttocks, gluteal region, or/and lower extremity; and 3) alleviation of symptoms of neurogenic claudication when sitting or lying and aggravation of symptoms when standing and walking. Subjects were excluded if they had severe neurologic signs and symptoms, coronary artery disease, severe vascular or pulmonary disease, recent lumbar–thoracic fractures, spinal tumor or infection, or lower extremity fracture. All participants provided informed consent before participation. Ethical approval was obtained from the INJE University Ethics Committee for Human Investigations. All subjects were evaluated using three self-reported low back disability scales (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RDQ], and Spinal Stenosis Scale [SSS]) to assess their level of pain and functional status before and after the home exercise program. To assess the walking velocity and stride and step lengths, we used a GAITRite system (CIR Systems, Inc., Sparta, NJ, USA), which detects the activation of sensors and automatically calculates the spatiotemporal gait parameters. During the 4-week exercise program, all participants were asked to perform exercises 5 days/week (total of 20 repetitions), and each session was –40 min in duration. The home exercise program comprised knee-to-chest exercises, thoracic extension self-mobilization, double knee-to-chest exercises, lower abdominal strengthening exercises, lumbar rotation stretching, hip abduction strengthening exercises, rectus femoris self-stretching, and iliopsoas self-stretching, as reported by Backstrom et al.15). The results were analyzed statistically using the paired t-test, and statistical significance was set at a value of p ≤ 0.05. All analyses were performed using the SPSS ver. 17.0 software package.

RESULTS

The ODI (r = 0.702, p < 0.004), RDQ (r = 0.939, p < 0.000), SSS-SS (r = 0.885, p < 0.000), and SSS-FS (r = 0.765, p < 0.001) scores were improved significantly after home exercise. Among the spatiotemporal gait parameters, walking velocity (p = 0.09), step and stride lengths on the left (p = 0.51 and p = 0.99, respectively), and step and stride lengths on the right (p = 0.86 and p = 0.61, respectively) were not changed significantly. Before and after the exercise program, the walking pain intensity was improved significantly (p = 0.05 and p = 0.026, respectively) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Self-reported questionnaires and comparison of spatiotemporal gait parameters and pain intensity before home exercise and after home exercise

VariableMean ± SD
Before home exerciseAfter home exercise
ODI (%)37.48±8.1323.99±11.33*
RDQ10.87±4.357.20±4.63*
SSS-SS2.50±1.011.91±0.81*
SSS-FS1.73±0.701.27±0.42*
Before VAS (100 mm)32.66±30.5823.66±24.81*
After VAS (100 mm)52.00±26.7743.00±25.26*
Lt step length (cm)51.16±5.8350.72±6.75
Lt stride length (cm)101.78±12.51101.80±15.21
Rt step length (cm)50.11±6.9449.97±7.92
Rt stride length (cm)101.36±12.69102.09±14.94
Velocity (cm/s)85.82±16.9789.18±16.99

ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; RDQ, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SSS-SS, Spinal Stenosis Scale-Symptom Subscale; SSS-FS, Spinal Stenosis Scale-Function Subscale; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale. *Significant difference from before home exercise (p ≤ 0.05)

ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; RDQ, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SSS-SS, Spinal Stenosis Scale-Symptom Subscale; SSS-FS, Spinal Stenosis Scale-Function Subscale; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale. *Significant difference from before home exercise (p ≤ 0.05)

DISCUSSION

We assessed the effect of home exercise on self-reported questionnaire scores and gait parameters in patients with LSS. Our data demonstrate the positive effects of home exercise. Lumbar flexion exercises are effective for increasing the sagittal plane dimensions of the central spinal canal, strengthening the abdominal muscles, and improving spinal mobility15, 16). Furthermore, improved hip flexibility is frequently necessary for a pain-free gait in patients with LSS15). A previous case study17) and one randomized controlled trial9) reported that lumbar flexion exercises reduced pain and significantly improved the average ODI score among patients with LSS. In addition, combined flexion exercise (treadmill walking with body weight support vs. cycling) was beneficial, as evidenced by both the modified ODI and RDQ scores18). However, our study showed no changes in the gait parameters. Gait training was not performed in our study. In some studies, unlike ours, lumbar flexion exercises and gait training were performed together. Whitman et al.9) suggested two 6-week conservative treatment programs for patients with LSS; one program included manual therapy, body weight-supported treadmill walking, and exercise, and the other program included lumbar flexion exercises, a treadmill walking program, and ultrasound therapy. Gait training in patients with LSS is beneficial to the cardiovascular system, enhances mobility and strength, and decreases fear avoidance issues related to walking15). These results suggest that home-based exercise with gait training is necessary to change gait parameters. We consider that specific gait training such as body weight-supported treadmill walking was not included in our home-exercise program, which resulted in no significant changes in gait parameters after the 4-week exercise program. This study had several limitations: 1) the small number of subjects, 2) lack of a control group, and 3) complete exclusion of medications. However, our results regarding home exercise are encouraging and suggest that elderly patients with LSS can experience clinical improvement characterized by a marked reduction in symptoms and an increase in function. In conclusion, home exercise improved the scores of three self-reported questionnaires (ODI, SSQ, and RDQ), but it did not change gait parameters in patients with LSS in the current study. In future studies, the effects of home exercise that includes other lumbar spine exercises and gait training should be evaluated.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Benefits of exercise for community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Jonathan F Bean; Ariana Vora; Walter R Frontera
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Antti Malmivaara; Francisco Kovacs; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Liisa Salmi; Heikki Kröger; Juan Andrade; Rosa Jiménez; Antti Tapaninaho; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Evaluation of the elderly patient with an abnormal gait.

Authors:  Moe R Lim; Russel C Huang; Anita Wu; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Lumbar spinal stenosis-diagnosis and management of the aging spine.

Authors:  Karen Maloney Backstrom; Julie M Whitman; Timothy W Flynn
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2011-03-02

5.  A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Julie M Whitman; Timothy W Flynn; John D Childs; Robert S Wainner; Howard E Gill; Michael G Ryder; Matthew B Garber; Andrew C Bennett; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Robert B Keller; Yen A Wu; Richard A Deyo; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J N Katz; G Stucki; S J Lipson; A H Fossel; L J Grobler; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

9.  Treadmill walking with body weight support is no more effective than cycling when added to an exercise program for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yong-Hao Pua; Cong-Cong Cai; Kian-Chong Lim
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2007

Review 10.  The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark S Jarrett; Joseph F Orlando; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Influence of Exercise on Perceived Pain and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jarrett Slater; Morey J Kolber; Kristen C Schellhase; Chetan K Patel; Carey E Rothschild; Xinliang Liu; William J Hanney
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2015-02-16

2.  Effects of modified bridging exercises on static postural control of a poststroke hemiplegic patient who had received surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a case report.

Authors:  Young-Dong Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Effects of flexion-distraction manipulation therapy on pain and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jioun Choi; Sangyong Lee; Chunbae Jeon
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 4.  Facioscapulohumeral distrophy and physiotherapy: a literary review.

Authors:  Bruno Corrado; Gianluca Ciardi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-07-22

5.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of an aerobic exercise program and the personality characteristics of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Meltem Vural; Tonguc Demir Berkol; Zeynep Erdogdu; Keramettin Pekedis; Batuhan Kuçukserat; Cihan Aksoy
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-10-28

6.  Effect of exhalation exercise on trunk muscle activity and oswestry disability index of patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jeong-Il Kang; Dae-Keun Jeong; Hyun Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 7.  Exercise therapy versus surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhuomao Mo; Renwen Zhang; Minmin Chang; Shujie Tang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Coexistence of osteopoikilosis with seronegative spondyloarthritis and spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Saliha Eroglu Demir; Nihal Özaras; Emine Poyraz; Hüseyin Toprak; Mustafa Güler
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26

9.  The effects of aquatic walking and jogging program on physical function and fall efficacy in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Eunsook Sung
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2015-10-30

10.  Effect of spinal decompression on the lumbar muscle activity and disk height in patients with herniated intervertebral disk.

Authors:  Jeong-Il Kang; Dae-Keun Jeong; Hyun Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-11-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.