Literature DB >> 24648579

Bioequivalence of 2 azithromycin capsule formulations: a randomized, single-dose, open-label, 2-period crossover study in healthy male pakistani volunteers.

Zafar Iqbal1, Muhammad Imran Khan1, Abbas Khan1, Abad Khan1, Yasar Shah1, Lateef Ahmad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 68 brands of azithromycin capsule formulations are available in Pakistan; however, published data on their bioequivalence in the Pakistani population are not available.
OBJECTIVE: Upon instructions from and approval of the Ministry of Health, Pakistan, this study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of a locally manufactured azithromycin capsule formulation with a reference formulation from a multinational manufacturer. This study compared dissolution profiles, relative bioavailability, and other pharmacokinetic parameters of the 2 formulations.
METHODS: A single oral 500-mg dose of the 2 formulations was administered to 12 healthy adult Pakistani male volunteers under fasting conditions in a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study. The trial included collection of blood samples over 48 hours and a 2-week washout period. Azithromycin serum concentrations were quantified using a validated RP-HPLC/ultraviolet (UV) detection method. These results were used to determine the intended pharmacokinetic parameters. As mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, the test and reference formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the log-transformed values of their pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predetermined range of 0.8 to 1.25.
RESULTS: When subjected to a simple model independent approach of dissolution profile comparison, f 1 (difference) and f 2 (similarity factor) were found to be 5.47 and 70.04, respectively. Similarly, the 2 azithromycin capsule formulations were well tolerated by all volunteers. Low %CV of the pharmacokinetic parameters at a sample size of 12 and significance level of 0.05 contributed to acceptable (>0.8) power of the test. The 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-48, Tmax, t1/2, and mean residence time, respectively, were 0.83-0.93, 0.85-1.10, 0.86-1.08, 0.92-1.17, and 0.92-1.16.
CONCLUSION: This single-dose study found that test and reference formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these fasted, healthy male Pakistani volunteers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RP-HPLC/UV detection method; azithromycin; bioequivalence; human serum; pharmacokinetics; quantification

Year:  2011        PMID: 24648579      PMCID: PMC3957164          DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2011.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp        ISSN: 0011-393X


  19 in total

Review 1.  Bioavailability and bioequivalence: an FDA regulatory overview.

Authors:  M L Chen; V Shah; R Patnaik; W Adams; A Hussain; D Conner; M Mehta; H Malinowski; J Lazor; S M Huang; D Hare; L Lesko; D Sporn; R Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  2009-06

3.  In vitro dissolution profile comparison--statistics and analysis of the similarity factor, f2.

Authors:  V P Shah; Y Tsong; P Sathe; J P Liu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Spectrum and mode of action of azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new 15-membered-ring macrolide with improved potency against gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  J Retsema; A Girard; W Schelkly; M Manousos; M Anderson; G Bright; R Borovoy; L Brennan; R Mason
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Outbreak of anticonvulsant intoxication in an Australian city.

Authors:  J H Tyrer; M J Eadie; J M Sutherland; W D Hooper
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-10-31

6.  Bioavailability of two oral formulations of azithromycin 500 mg: a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult subjects.

Authors:  Alfredo Piñeyro-López; Everardo Pineyro-Garza; Oscar Torres-Alanís; Raúl Reyes-Araiza; Magdalena Gómez Silva; Noemí Wacksman; Rubén Luján Rangel; Alberto de Lago; Mario González-de la Parra; Salvador Namur
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo activity of novel 9-deoxo-9a-AZA-9a-homoerythromycin A derivatives; a new class of macrolide antibiotics, the azalides.

Authors:  G M Bright; A A Nagel; J Bordner; K A Desai; J N Dibrino; J Nowakowska; L Vincent; R M Watrous; F C Sciavolino; A R English
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of rupatadine when coadministered with azithromycin at steady-state levels: a randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover, Phase I study.

Authors:  Anna Solans; Iñaki Izquierdo; Esther Donado; Rosa Antonijoan; Juana Peña; Teresa Nadal; Marcel-Lí Carbó; Manuel Merlos; Manel Barbanoj
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of a Single Oral Dose of 500-mg Azithromycin Granules: A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Han Chinese Volunteers.

Authors:  Jing Ren; Xue-Hua Jiang; Kejia Li; Chuanchuan Zhang; Chenrui Li; Ling Wang
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2007-09

10.  Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in plasma and sinus mucosal tissue following administration of extended-release or immediate-release formulations in adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Annie F Fang; James N Palmer; Alexander G Chiu; Jeffrey L Blumer; Penelope H Crownover; Michael D Campbell; Bharat D Damle
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.