Noam Ben-Eliezer1, Daniel K Sodickson, Kai Tobias Block. 1. The Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York, University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quantitative T2 -relaxation-based contrast has the potential to provide valuable clinical information. Practical T2 -mapping, however, is impaired either by prohibitively long acquisition times or by contamination of fast multiecho protocols by stimulated and indirect echoes. This work presents a novel postprocessing approach aiming to overcome the common penalties associated with multiecho protocols, and enabling rapid and accurate mapping of T2 relaxation values. METHODS: Bloch simulations are used to estimate the actual echo-modulation curve (EMC) in a multi-spin-echo experiment. Simulations are repeated for a range of T2 values and transmit field scales, yielding a database of simulated EMCs, which is then used to identify the T2 value whose EMC most closely matches the experimentally measured data at each voxel. RESULTS: T2 maps of both phantom and in vivo scans were successfully reconstructed, closely matching maps produced from single spin-echo data. Results were consistent over the physiological range of T2 values and across different experimental settings. CONCLUSION: The proposed technique allows accurate T2 mapping in clinically feasible scan times, free of user- and scanner-dependent variations, while providing a comprehensive framework that can be extended to model other parameters (e.g., T1 , B1 (+) , B0 , diffusion) and support arbitrary acquisition schemes.
PURPOSE: Quantitative T2 -relaxation-based contrast has the potential to provide valuable clinical information. Practical T2 -mapping, however, is impaired either by prohibitively long acquisition times or by contamination of fast multiecho protocols by stimulated and indirect echoes. This work presents a novel postprocessing approach aiming to overcome the common penalties associated with multiecho protocols, and enabling rapid and accurate mapping of T2 relaxation values. METHODS: Bloch simulations are used to estimate the actual echo-modulation curve (EMC) in a multi-spin-echo experiment. Simulations are repeated for a range of T2 values and transmit field scales, yielding a database of simulated EMCs, which is then used to identify the T2 value whose EMC most closely matches the experimentally measured data at each voxel. RESULTS: T2 maps of both phantom and in vivo scans were successfully reconstructed, closely matching maps produced from single spin-echo data. Results were consistent over the physiological range of T2 values and across different experimental settings. CONCLUSION: The proposed technique allows accurate T2 mapping in clinically feasible scan times, free of user- and scanner-dependent variations, while providing a comprehensive framework that can be extended to model other parameters (e.g., T1 , B1 (+) , B0 , diffusion) and support arbitrary acquisition schemes.
Authors: Philipp Ehses; Nicole Seiberlich; Dan Ma; Felix A Breuer; Peter M Jakob; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Judong Pan; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Tom Joseph; Daniel Kuo; Gabby B Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Thomas M Link Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Asad A Usman; Kirsi Taimen; Marie Wasielewski; Jennifer McDonald; Saurabh Shah; Shivraman Giri; William Cotts; Edwin McGee; Robert Gordon; Jeremy D Collins; Michael Markl; James C Carr Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold Journal: Nature Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Christian Prinz; Paula Ramos Delgado; Thomas Wilhelm Eigentler; Ludger Starke; Thoralf Niendorf; Sonia Waiczies Journal: MAGMA Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Thomas Benkert; John P Mugler; David S Rigie; Daniel K Sodickson; Hersh Chandarana; Kai Tobias Block Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-04-15 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhengwei Zhou; Pei Han; Bill Zhou; Anthony G Christodoulou; Jaime L Shaw; Zixin Deng; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 4.668