BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA) is a common immunosuppressive drug used for relapse prevention in neuromyelitis optica (NMO). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to assess efficacy, tolerability and retention of AZA in a large NMO cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of 103 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMO and NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients treated with AZA. RESULTS: This is the largest reported cohort of AQP4-Ab positive patients treated with AZA. Eighty-nine per cent (n = 92) had reduction in median annualised relapse rates from 1.5 (IQR 0.6-4.0) to 0 (IQR 0-0.27, p < 0.00005) with treatment. Sixty-one per cent (n = 63) remained relapse free at a median follow-up of 18 months. Neurological function improved or stabilised in 78%. At last follow-up, treatment was discontinued in 46% (n = 47). Of these, 62% (n = 29) were because of side effects, 19% (n = 9) because of death, 15% (n = 7) because of ongoing disease activity, and 2% (n = 1) because of pregnancy. Using Kaplan-Meyer curves, we estimate that 73%, 58%, 47% and 33% of patients will remain on AZA for longer than one, three, five and 10 years, respectively, after initiation of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AZA is a modestly effective treatment for NMO. However, many patients discontinue AZA over time and this seems to reflect poor tolerability more than lack of efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA) is a common immunosuppressive drug used for relapse prevention in neuromyelitis optica (NMO). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this paper is to assess efficacy, tolerability and retention of AZA in a large NMO cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of 103 aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMO and NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients treated with AZA. RESULTS: This is the largest reported cohort of AQP4-Ab positive patients treated with AZA. Eighty-nine per cent (n = 92) had reduction in median annualised relapse rates from 1.5 (IQR 0.6-4.0) to 0 (IQR 0-0.27, p < 0.00005) with treatment. Sixty-one per cent (n = 63) remained relapse free at a median follow-up of 18 months. Neurological function improved or stabilised in 78%. At last follow-up, treatment was discontinued in 46% (n = 47). Of these, 62% (n = 29) were because of side effects, 19% (n = 9) because of death, 15% (n = 7) because of ongoing disease activity, and 2% (n = 1) because of pregnancy. Using Kaplan-Meyer curves, we estimate that 73%, 58%, 47% and 33% of patients will remain on AZA for longer than one, three, five and 10 years, respectively, after initiation of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AZA is a modestly effective treatment for NMO. However, many patients discontinue AZA over time and this seems to reflect poor tolerability more than lack of efficacy.
Authors: Sven Jarius; Klemens Ruprecht; Ingo Kleiter; Nadja Borisow; Nasrin Asgari; Kalliopi Pitarokoili; Florence Pache; Oliver Stich; Lena-Alexandra Beume; Martin W Hümmert; Marius Ringelstein; Corinna Trebst; Alexander Winkelmann; Alexander Schwarz; Mathias Buttmann; Hanna Zimmermann; Joseph Kuchling; Diego Franciotta; Marco Capobianco; Eberhard Siebert; Carsten Lukas; Mirjam Korporal-Kuhnke; Jürgen Haas; Kai Fechner; Alexander U Brandt; Kathrin Schanda; Orhan Aktas; Friedemann Paul; Markus Reindl; Brigitte Wildemann Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: Jayne L Chamberlain; Saif Huda; Daniel H Whittam; Marcelo Matiello; B Paul Morgan; Anu Jacob Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Mattheus C B Wielenga; Jooske F van Lidth de Jeude; Sanne L Rosekrans; Alon D Levin; Monique Schukking; Geert R A M D'Haens; Jarom Heijmans; Marnix Jansen; Vanesa Muncan; Gijs R van den Brink Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742