Literature DB >> 2464719

The communicative effectiveness index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia.

J Lomas1, L Pickard, S Bester, H Elbard, A Finlayson, C Zoghaib.   

Abstract

Groups of aphasic patients and their spouses generated a series of communication situations that they felt were important in their day-to-day life. Using criteria to ensure that the situations were generalizable across people, times, and places, we reduced the number of situations to 36 and constructed an index that allowed the significant others of 11 recovering and 11 stable aphasic individuals to rate their partners' performance in the situations on two occasions 6 weeks apart. These data were then used to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) as a measure of change in functional communication ability. Further application of a generalization criterion reduced the final index to 16 situations. Results showed the CETI to be internally consistent and to have acceptable test-retest and interrater reliability. It was valid as a measure of functional communication according to the pattern of correlations found with other measures (Western Aphasia Battery, Speech Questionnaire, and global ratings). Finally, it was responsive to functionally important performance change between testings. Further research with the CETI and its usefulness for clinicians and researchers are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2464719     DOI: 10.1044/jshd.5401.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord        ISSN: 0022-4677


  45 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of errorless naming treatment and gestural facilitation for word retrieval in aphasia.

Authors:  Anastasia M Raymer; Beth McHose; Kimberly G Smith; Lisa Iman; Alexis Ambrose; Colleen Casselton
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Self- and surrogate-reported communication functioning in aphasia.

Authors:  Patrick J Doyle; William D Hula; Shannon N Austermann Hula; Clement A Stone; Julie L Wambaugh; Katherine B Ross; James G Schumacher
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Implementation of computer-based language therapy in aphasia.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Joseph B Orange; Donald J Jamieson
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.570

4.  Measuring communicative participation: a review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Kathryn M Yorkston; Estelle R Klasner; Brian J Dudgeon; Jean C Deitz; Carolyn R Baylor; Robert M Miller; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 6.  First decade of research on constrained-induced treatment approaches for aphasia rehabilitation.

Authors:  Marcus Meinzer; Amy D Rodriguez; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Inner Speech in Aphasia: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Fama; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Effects of semantic context on access to words of low imageability in deep-phonological dysphasia: a treatment case study.

Authors:  Laura Mary McCarthy; Michelene Kalinyak-Fliszar; Francine Kohen; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and aphasia: the case of mr. C.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Edna M Babbitt; Rosalind Hurwitz; Lynn M Rogers; James Stinear; Xue Wang; Richard L Harvey; Todd Parrish
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.119

10.  Communicative value of self cues in aphasia: A re-evaluation.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Victoria L Scharp; Robert C Marshall
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.