| Literature DB >> 24647098 |
Trevor van Mierlo1, Rachel Fournier1, Anathalie Jean-Charles2, Jacinthe Hovington2, Isabelle Ethier2, Peter Selby3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: For many organizations, limited budgets and phased funding restrict the development of digital health tools. This problem is often exacerbated by the ever-increasing sophistication of technology and costs related to programming and maintenance. Traditional development methods tend to be costly and inflexible and not client centered. The purpose of this study is to analyze the use of Agile software development and outcomes of a three-phase mHealth program designed to help young adult Quebecers quit smoking.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24647098 PMCID: PMC3960136 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1SMAT Development Methodology.
SHO Text Messaging Distribution Frequency – Current Smoker and Recent Quitter Profiles.
| User Profile | Pre Quit Date | Quit Date | Post Quit Date |
| Current Smoker | 6 days | 1 day | 13 weeks |
| Recent Quitter | n/a | n/a | 11 weeks |
Sample SMAT Phase I Text Message Selection Process.
| Style Tested But Not Chosen (too impersonal and institutional) | Style Chosen (normal language, “cool” but not “too cool”) | Style Tested But Not Chosen (too young, not serious or convincing) |
|
|
|
|
Phase I Proactive Text Messaging Schedule.
| Preparation (One Week) | Quit Day | Week 1 | Weeks 2–4 | Weeks 5–12 |
| One message per day | Two messages | Two messages per day | One message per day | Two messages per week |
Figure 2Sample SMAT Phase II conversation with Reactive Text Message keyword envie (craving).
Figure 3TaChI Interface.
SMAT Program Statistics, and Growth in Functionality.
| Phase I | Phase II | Phase III (ongoing) | |
| August 4, 2010–March 31, 2011 | December 6, 2011–September 30, 2012 | March 15, 2013–September 4, 2013 | |
|
| 240 | 1,103 | 1,101 |
|
| 182 | 994 | 873 |
|
| 6,108 | 42,613 | 44,386 |
|
| 6 | 11 | 12 |
|
| 59% (n = 159) | 65% (n = 646) | 61% (n = 531) |
|
| 1,099 | 3,262 | |
|
| 38% (n = 374) | 60% (n = 523) | |
|
| 8% (n = 83) | 13% (n = 115) | |
|
| 6% (n = 55) | 3% (n = 28) | |
|
| 1% (n = 11) | ||
|
| 36% (n = 318) | ||
|
| 19% (n = 163) | ||
|
| 10% (n = 85) | ||
|
| 44% (n = 385) | ||
|
| 22% (n = 191) |
* Following best practice, SMAT requires a double opt-in.
Demographic Characteristics.
| Phase I | Phase II | Phase III (ongoing) | |
| August 4, 2010–March 31, 2011 | December 6, 2011–September 30, 2012 | March 15, 2013–September 4, 2013 | |
|
| 240 | 300 | 174 |
|
| 182 | 994 | 873 |
|
| 51% (n = 94) | 51% (n = 508) | 44% (n = 388) |
|
| 62% (n = 112) | 41% (n = 403) | 24% (n = 212) |
|
| 17 | 17 | 20 |