Amit K Mathur1, Valarie B Ashby, Douglas S Fuller, Min Zhang, Robert M Merion, Alan Leichtman, John Kalbfleisch. 1. 1 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI. 2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI. 3 Kidney Epidemiology and Cost Center, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI. 4 Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI. 5 Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI. 6 Address correspondence to: Amit K. Mathur, M.D., M.S., 2922 Taubman Center, SPC 5300, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5300.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to compare liver transplant waiting list access by demographics and geography relative to the pool of potential liver transplant candidates across the United States using a novel metric of access to care, termed a liver wait-listing ratio (LWR). METHODS: We calculated LWRs from national liver transplant registration data and liver mortality data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the National Center for Healthcare Statistics from 1999 to 2006 to identify variation by diagnosis, demographics, geography, and era. RESULTS: Among patients with ALF and CLF, African Americans had significantly lower access to the waiting list compared with whites (acute: 0.201 versus 0.280; pre-MELD 0.201 versus 0.290; MELD era: 0.201 versus 0.274; all, P<0.0001) (chronic: 0.084 versus 0.163; pre-MELD 0.085 versus 0.179; MELD 0.084 versus 0.154; all, P<0.0001). Hispanics and whites had similar LWR in both eras (both P>0.05). In the MELD era, female subjects had greater access to the waiting list compared with male subjects (acute: 0.428 versus 0.154; chronic: 0.158 versus 0.140; all, P<0.0001). LWRs varied by three-fold by state (pre-MELD acute: 0.122-0.418, chronic: 0.092-0.247; MELD acute: 0.121-0.428, chronic: 0.092-0.243). CONCLUSIONS: The marked inequity in early access to liver transplantation underscores the need for local and national policy initiatives to affect this disparity.
BACKGROUND: We sought to compare liver transplant waiting list access by demographics and geography relative to the pool of potential liver transplant candidates across the United States using a novel metric of access to care, termed a liver wait-listing ratio (LWR). METHODS: We calculated LWRs from national liver transplant registration data and liver mortality data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the National Center for Healthcare Statistics from 1999 to 2006 to identify variation by diagnosis, demographics, geography, and era. RESULTS: Among patients with ALF and CLF, African Americans had significantly lower access to the waiting list compared with whites (acute: 0.201 versus 0.280; pre-MELD 0.201 versus 0.290; MELD era: 0.201 versus 0.274; all, P<0.0001) (chronic: 0.084 versus 0.163; pre-MELD 0.085 versus 0.179; MELD 0.084 versus 0.154; all, P<0.0001). Hispanics and whites had similar LWR in both eras (both P>0.05). In the MELD era, female subjects had greater access to the waiting list compared with male subjects (acute: 0.428 versus 0.154; chronic: 0.158 versus 0.140; all, P<0.0001). LWRs varied by three-fold by state (pre-MELD acute: 0.122-0.418, chronic: 0.092-0.247; MELD acute: 0.121-0.428, chronic: 0.092-0.243). CONCLUSIONS: The marked inequity in early access to liver transplantation underscores the need for local and national policy initiatives to affect this disparity.
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Lisa A Cooper; Lloyd E Ratner; Thomas A LaVeist; Neil R Powe Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: David M Dickinson; Dawn M Dykstra; Gregory N Levine; Shiqian Li; James C Welch; Randall L Webb Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: D E Eckhoff; B M McGuire; C C Young; L Frenette; S L Hudson; J Contreras; J S Bynon Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Andrew Wey; Joshua Pyke; David P Schladt; Sommer E Gentry; Tim Weaver; Nicholas Salkowski; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni; Jon J Snyder Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Douglas R Murken; Allison W Peng; David D Aufhauser; Peter L Abt; David S Goldberg; Matthew H Levine Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Sommer E Gentry; Eric K H Chow; Allan Massie; Xun Luo; Eugene Shteyn; Joshua Pyke; David Zaun; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Bert Kasiske; Dorry L Segev Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Margaux N Mustian; Brittany A Shelton; Paul A MacLennan; Rhiannon D Reed; Jared A White; Devin E Eckhoff; Jayme E Locke; Richard M Allman; Stephen H Gray Journal: Transplantation Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Michael Darden; Geoffrey Parker; Dominique Monlezun; Edward Anderson; Joseph F Buell Journal: World J Surg Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 3.352