Literature DB >> 24645649

The fraction of cells that resume growth after acetic acid addition is a strain-dependent parameter of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Steve Swinnen1, Miguel Fernández-Niño, Daniel González-Ramos, Antonius J A van Maris, Elke Nevoigt.   

Abstract

High acetic acid tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a relevant phenotype in industrial biotechnology when using lignocellulosic hydrolysates as feedstock. A screening of 38 S. cerevisiae strains for tolerance to acetic acid revealed considerable differences, particularly with regard to the duration of the latency phase. To understand how this phenotype is quantitatively manifested, four strains exhibiting significant differences were studied in more detail. Our data show that the duration of the latency phase is primarily determined by the fraction of cells within the population that resume growth. Only this fraction contributed to the exponential growth observed after the latency phase, while all other cells persisted in a viable but non-proliferating state. A remarkable variation in the size of the fraction was observed among the tested strains differing by several orders of magnitude. In fact, only 11 out of 10(7)  cells of the industrial bioethanol production strain Ethanol Red resumed growth after exposure to 157 mM acetic acid at pH 4.5, while this fraction was 3.6 × 10(6) (out of 10(7)  cells) in the highly acetic acid tolerant isolate ATCC 96581. These strain-specific differences are genetically determined and represent a valuable starting point to identify genetic targets for future strain improvement.
© 2014 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Saccharomyces cerevisiae; acetic acid tolerance; cell-to-cell heterogeneity; intraspecies diversity; lignocellulose; yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24645649     DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res        ISSN: 1567-1356            Impact factor:   2.796


  19 in total

1.  Effects of Oxygen Availability on Acetic Acid Tolerance and Intracellular pH in Dekkera bruxellensis.

Authors:  Claudia Capusoni; Stefania Arioli; Paolo Zambelli; M Moktaduzzaman; Diego Mora; Concetta Compagno
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Metabolism of Multiple Aromatic Compounds in Corn Stover Hydrolysate by Rhodopseudomonas palustris.

Authors:  Samantha Austin; Wayne S Kontur; Arne Ulbrich; J Zachary Oshlag; Weiping Zhang; Alan Higbee; Yaoping Zhang; Joshua J Coon; David B Hodge; Timothy J Donohue; Daniel R Noguera
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  PEP3 overexpression shortens lag phase but does not alter growth rate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to acetic acid stress.

Authors:  Jun Ding; Garrett Holzwarth; C Samuel Bradford; Ben Cooley; Allen S Yoshinaga; Jana Patton-Vogt; Hagai Abeliovich; Michael H Penner; Alan T Bakalinsky
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Overexpression of acetyl-CoA synthetase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases acetic acid tolerance.

Authors:  Jun Ding; Garrett Holzwarth; Michael H Penner; Jana Patton-Vogt; Alan T Bakalinsky
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  The Cytosolic pH of Individual Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells Is a Key Factor in Acetic Acid Tolerance.

Authors:  Miguel Fernández-Niño; Maribel Marquina; Steve Swinnen; Boris Rodríguez-Porrata; Elke Nevoigt; Joaquín Ariño
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Improved Acetic Acid Resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Overexpression of the WHI2 Gene Identified through Inverse Metabolic Engineering.

Authors:  Yingying Chen; Lisa Stabryla; Na Wei
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Blocking Mitophagy Does Not Significantly Improve Fuel Ethanol Production in Bioethanol Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kevy Pontes Eliodório; Gabriel Caetano de Gois E Cunha; Brianna A White; Demisha H M Patel; Fangyi Zhang; Ewald H Hettema; Thiago Olitta Basso; Andreas Karoly Gombert; Vijayendran Raghavendran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.005

9.  A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations.

Authors:  Daniel González-Ramos; Arthur R Gorter de Vries; Sietske S Grijseels; Margo C van Berkum; Steve Swinnen; Marcel van den Broek; Elke Nevoigt; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Growth inhibition of S. cerevisiae, B. subtilis, and E. coli by lignocellulosic and fermentation products.

Authors:  Joana P C Pereira; Peter J T Verheijen; Adrie J J Straathof
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.