Literature DB >> 24644411

Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae?

Nil Tokgoz1, Murat Ucar1, Aylin Billur Erdogan1, Koray Kilic1, Cahide Ozcan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of spinal and paraspinal anatomic markers in both the diagnosis of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) and identification of vertebral levels on lumbar MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lumbar MRI from 1049 adult patients were studied. By comparing with the whole-spine localizer, the diagnostic errors in numbering vertebral segments on lumbar MRI were evaluated. The morphology of S1-2 disc, L5 and S1 body, and lumbar spinous processes (SPs) were evaluated by using sagittal MRI. The positions of right renal artery (RRA), superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation (AB) and conus medullaris (CM) were described.
RESULTS: The diagnostic error for evaluation of vertebral segmentation on lumbar MRI alone was 14.1%. In lumbarization, all patients revealed a well-formed S1-2 disc with squared S1 body. A rhombus-shaped L5 body in sacralization and a rectangular-shaped S1 body in lumbarization were found. The L3 had the longest SP. The most common sites of spinal and paraspinal structures were: RRA at L1 body (53.6%) and L1-2 disc (34.1%), superior mesenteric artery at L1 body (55.1%) and T12-L1 disc (31.6%), and AB at L4 body (71.1%). CM had variable locations, changing from the T12-L1 disc to L2 body. They were located at higher sacralization and lower lumbarization.
CONCLUSION: The spinal morphologic features and locations of the spinal and paraspinal structures on lumbar MRI are not completely reliable for the diagnosis of LSTVs and identification on the vertebral levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbosacral vertebrae; MRI; Spine; Transitional vertebrae

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24644411      PMCID: PMC3955794          DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Radiol        ISSN: 1229-6929            Impact factor:   3.500


  22 in total

1.  Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of lumbar vertebrae in Singaporean Asians.

Authors:  S H Tan; E C Teo; H C Chua
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Verification of lumbar vertebral bodies.

Authors:  M D Ralston; T A Dykes; B I Applebaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Using MRI to evaluate anatomic significance of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments.

Authors:  Chang Hee Lee; Bo Kyoung Seo; Young Chil Choi; Hyun Joon Shin; Jeong Hee Park; Hae Jeong Jeon; Kyeong Ah Kim; Cheol Min Park; Baek Hyun Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Verification of lumbosacral segments on MR images: identification of transitional vertebrae.

Authors:  P Y Hahn; J J Strobel; F J Hahn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional junctions.

Authors:  R E Wigh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  G P Konin; D M Walz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Determining the lumbar vertebral segments on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W C Peh; T H Siu; J H Chan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The anatomical relationship of the aortic bifurcation to the lumbar vertebrae: a MRI study.

Authors:  M Chithriki; M Jaibaji; R D Steele
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2002-07-20       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Transitional lumbosacral discs. probability of herniation.

Authors:  R E Wigh; H F Anthony
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Phylogeny and the herniated disc.

Authors:  R E Wigh
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  10 in total

1.  Localizing the L5 Vertebra Using Nerve Morphology on MRI: An Accurate and Reliable Technique.

Authors:  M E Peckham; T A Hutchins; S E Stilwill; M K Mills; B J Morrissey; E A R Joiner; R K Sanders; G J Stoddard; L M Shah
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Psoas proximal insertion as a simple and reliable landmark for numbering lumbar vertebrae on MRI of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  François Ropars; J Mesrar; J Ognard; S Querellou; J Rousset; M Garetier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A Review of Symptomatic Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Bertolotti's Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Jancuska; Jeffrey M Spivak; John A Bendo
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 4.  A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration.

Authors:  Jayson Lian; Nicole Levine; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Quantitative measurements at the lumbosacral junction are more reliable parameters for identifying and numbering lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

Authors:  Suying Zhou; Lin Du; Xin Liu; Qiqi Wang; Jie Zhao; Yuchan Lv; Haitao Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Normative spino-pelvic parameters in patients with the lumbarization of S1 compared to a normal asymptomatic population.

Authors:  R Price; M Okamoto; J C Le Huec; K Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle.

Authors:  Lisheng Hou; Xuedong Bai; Haifeng Li; Tianjun Gao; Wei Li; Tianyong Wen; Qing He; Dike Ruan; Lijing Shi; Wei Bing
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Changes of Fixed Anatomical Spinopelvic Parameter in Patients with Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: A Matched Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Henryk Haffer; Luis Becker; Michael Putzier; Mats Wiethölter; Katharina Ziegeler; Torsten Diekhoff; Matthias Pumberger; Sebastian Hardt
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-02

9.  Role of Anatomical Landmarks in Identifying Normal and Transitional Vertebra in Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Devimeenal Jagannathan; Venkatraman Indiran; Fouzal Hithaya; M Alamelu; S Padmanaban
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15

10.  Evaluation of spinal-paraspinal parameters to determine segmentation of the vertebrae.

Authors:  Elif Peker; Nur Hürsoy; Habip E Akkaya; Sena Ünal; Başak Gülpınar; Bilgesu Arıkan; Ezgi Anamurluoğlu; İlhan M Erden
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.