BACKGROUND: Public attitudes are important in shaping public policy and the political will that determines future service provision. They also help to identify priorities for public education. This paper presents a review and synthesis of published literature on public attitudes to death and dying in the UK from 1990. METHOD: The approach to the review was systematic and involved searching for published research in five databases combined with reviewing references proposed by experts in the field and following up relevant citations from identified sources. The selected sources were assessed by the review team and analysed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: The review identified 22 sources reporting 19 studies which met our criteria for inclusion in the descriptive analysis. Three descriptive themes were identified: preferences relating to death and dying, attitudes to euthanasia and attitudes to life-sustaining treatments and interventions. CONCLUSION: The review outcomes challenge widespread assumptions about public attitudes to death and dying and identify the need for more rigorous work to better understand public views on dying and death. Such work is needed if public health services are to meet the expectations and reflect the wishes of individuals in this area in future.
BACKGROUND: Public attitudes are important in shaping public policy and the political will that determines future service provision. They also help to identify priorities for public education. This paper presents a review and synthesis of published literature on public attitudes to death and dying in the UK from 1990. METHOD: The approach to the review was systematic and involved searching for published research in five databases combined with reviewing references proposed by experts in the field and following up relevant citations from identified sources. The selected sources were assessed by the review team and analysed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: The review identified 22 sources reporting 19 studies which met our criteria for inclusion in the descriptive analysis. Three descriptive themes were identified: preferences relating to death and dying, attitudes to euthanasia and attitudes to life-sustaining treatments and interventions. CONCLUSION: The review outcomes challenge widespread assumptions about public attitudes to death and dying and identify the need for more rigorous work to better understand public views on dying and death. Such work is needed if public health services are to meet the expectations and reflect the wishes of individuals in this area in future.
Authors: Gemma Clarke; Elizabeth Fistein; Anthony Holland; Matthew Barclay; Pia Theimann; Stephen Barclay Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Karina Croucher; Lindsey Büster; Jennifer Dayes; Laura Green; Justine Raynsford; Louise Comerford Boyes; Christina Faull Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lauren R Miller-Lewis; Trent W Lewis; Jennifer Tieman; Deb Rawlings; Deborah Parker; Christine R Sanderson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mojgan Ansari; Maryam Rassouli; Mohamad Esmaiel Akbari; Abbas Abbaszadeh; Ali Akbari Sari Journal: Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery Date: 2018-04