A Richardson1, R Wagland2, R Foster2, J Symons3, C Davis4, L Boyland5, C Foster2, J Addington-Hall2. 1. Faculty of Health Science, Cancer Nursing and End of Life Care, University of Southampton & University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. 2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 3. Cancer of Unknown Primary Foundation, The Follies, Brightwalton, Newbury, UK. 4. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK. 5. Palliative Medicine, Oakhaven Hospice Trust, Lymington, Hampshire, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) have metastatic malignant disease without an identifiable primary site; it is the fourth most common cause of cancer death. OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' informal and professional carers' experiences of CUP to inform development of evidence-based, patient-centred care. METHODS: Qualitative study involving development of multiple exploratory case studies, each comprising a patient and nominated informal and professional carers, with contextual data extracted from medical records. RESULTS: 17 CUP patients, 14 informal and 13 professional carers participated in the study. Two inter-related themes distinct to CUP emerged: uncertainty and continuity of care. In the absence of a primary diagnosis, patients and informal carers experienced uncertainty regarding prognosis, possible recurrence and the primary's hereditary potential. Professional carers experienced difficulty communicating uncertainty to patients, ambiguity in deciding optimal treatment plans in the absence of trial data and a test or treat dilemma: when to discontinue seeking the primary and start treatment. Common problems with care continuity were amplified for CUP patients relating to coordination, accountability and timeliness of care. The remit of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) often excluded CUP, leading to "MDT tennis" where patients were "bounced" between MDTs. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of those with CUP is distinctive and it can serve to amplify some of the issues encountered by people with cancer. The clinical uncertainties related to CUP compound existing shortcomings in continuity of care, increasing the likelihood of a disrupted patient journey. However, while little can be done to overcome uncertainty, more could be done to address issues regarding continuity of care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND:Patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) have metastatic malignant disease without an identifiable primary site; it is the fourth most common cause of cancer death. OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' informal and professional carers' experiences of CUP to inform development of evidence-based, patient-centred care. METHODS: Qualitative study involving development of multiple exploratory case studies, each comprising a patient and nominated informal and professional carers, with contextual data extracted from medical records. RESULTS: 17 CUP patients, 14 informal and 13 professional carers participated in the study. Two inter-related themes distinct to CUP emerged: uncertainty and continuity of care. In the absence of a primary diagnosis, patients and informal carers experienced uncertainty regarding prognosis, possible recurrence and the primary's hereditary potential. Professional carers experienced difficulty communicating uncertainty to patients, ambiguity in deciding optimal treatment plans in the absence of trial data and a test or treat dilemma: when to discontinue seeking the primary and start treatment. Common problems with care continuity were amplified for CUP patients relating to coordination, accountability and timeliness of care. The remit of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) often excluded CUP, leading to "MDT tennis" where patients were "bounced" between MDTs. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of those with CUP is distinctive and it can serve to amplify some of the issues encountered by people with cancer. The clinical uncertainties related to CUP compound existing shortcomings in continuity of care, increasing the likelihood of a disrupted patient journey. However, while little can be done to overcome uncertainty, more could be done to address issues regarding continuity of care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: David Levy; Haryana M Dhillon; Anna Lomax; Michael Marthick; Catriona McNeil; Steven Kao; Judith Lacey Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kanwal Raghav; Hyunsoo Hwang; Alexandre A Jácome; Eric Bhang; Anneleis Willett; Ryan W Huey; Nishat P Dhillon; Jignesh Modha; Brandon Smaglo; Aurelio Matamoros; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Justin Jao; Michael J Overman; Xuemei Wang; F Anthony Greco; Jonathan M Loree; Gauri R Varadhachary Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Richard Wagland; Mike Bracher; Allison Drosdowsky; Alison Richardson; John Symons; Linda Mileshkin; Penny Schofield Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 2.692