Literature DB >> 33858857

Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram for Individualized Prediction of Survival in Cancer of Unknown Primary.

Kanwal Raghav1, Hyunsoo Hwang2, Alexandre A Jácome1, Eric Bhang3, Anneleis Willett1, Ryan W Huey1, Nishat P Dhillon1, Jignesh Modha1, Brandon Smaglo1, Aurelio Matamoros4, Jeannelyn S Estrella5, Justin Jao3, Michael J Overman1, Xuemei Wang2, F Anthony Greco6, Jonathan M Loree3, Gauri R Varadhachary7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prognostic uncertainty is a major challenge for cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Current models limit a meaningful patient-provider dialogue. We aimed to establish a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in CUP based on robust clinicopathologic prognostic factors. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We evaluated 521 patients with CUP at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; Houston, TX; 2012-2016). Baseline variables were analyzed using Cox regression and nomogram developed using significant predictors. Predictive accuracy and discriminatory performance were assessed by calibration curves, concordance probability estimate (CPE ± SE), and concordance statistic (C-index). The model was subjected to bootstrapping and multi-institutional external validations using two independent CUP cohorts: V1 [MDACC (2017), N = 103] and V2 (BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada and Sarah Cannon Cancer Center/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; N = 302).
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of entire cohort (N = 926) included: median age (63 years), women (51%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 (64%), adenocarcinomas (52%), ≥3 sites of metastases (30%), and median follow-up duration and OS of 40.1 and 14.7 months, respectively. Five independent prognostic factors were identified: gender, ECOG PS, histology, number of metastatic sites, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. The resulting model predicted OS with CPE of 0.69 [SE: ± 0.01; C-index: 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.74)] outperforming Culine/Seve prognostic models (CPE: 0.59 ± 0.01). CPE for external validation cohorts V1 and V2 were 0.67 (± 0.02) and 0.70 (± 0.01), respectively. Calibration curves for 1-year OS showed strong agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observations in all cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Our user-friendly CUP nomogram integrating commonly available baseline factors provides robust personalized prognostication which can aid clinical decision making and selection/stratification for clinical trials. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33858857      PMCID: PMC8197749          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  37 in total

1.  Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict the length of survival in patients with carcinomas of an unknown primary site.

Authors:  Stéphane Culine; Andrew Kramar; Mahasti Saghatchian; Roland Bugat; Thierry Lesimple; Alain Lortholary; Yacine Merrouche; Agnès Laplanche; Karim Fizazi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults.

Authors:  S J Goodlin; Z Zhong; J Lynn; J M Teno; J P Fago; N Desbiens; A F Connors; N S Wenger; R S Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cancer patient preferences for communication of prognosis in the metastatic setting.

Authors:  Rebecca G Hagerty; Phyllis N Butow; Peter A Ellis; Elizabeth A Lobb; Susan Pendlebury; Natasha Leighl; David Goldstein; Sing Kai Lo; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prediction of patient survival by healthcare professionals in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit: a prospective study.

Authors:  Feargal Twomey; Norma O'Leary; Tony O'Brien
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2008 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 5.  Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arnoud J Templeton; Mairéad G McNamara; Boštjan Šeruga; Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Priya Aneja; Alberto Ocaña; Raya Leibowitz-Amit; Guru Sonpavde; Jennifer J Knox; Ben Tran; Ian F Tannock; Eitan Amir
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Patients' experiences of carcinoma of unknown primary site: dealing with uncertainty.

Authors:  Lucy Boyland; Carol Davis
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  What oncologists believe they said and what patients believe they heard: an analysis of phase I trial discussions.

Authors:  Valerie Jenkins; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Carolyn Langridge; Susan Catt; Denis C Talbot; Lesley J Fallowfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cytokine profile and prognostic significance of high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Z-Y Chen; K Raghav; C H Lieu; Z-Q Jiang; C Eng; J-N Vauthey; G J Chang; W Qiao; J Morris; D Hong; P Hoff; H Tran; D G Menter; J Heymach; M Overman; S Kopetz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Inflammation as a validated prognostic determinant in carcinoma of unknown primary site.

Authors:  Z Mohamed; D J Pinato; F A Mauri; K-W Chen; P M-H Chang; R Sharma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced rare cancers.

Authors:  Aung Naing; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Bettzy Stephen; Daniel D Karp; Joud Hajjar; Jordi Rodon Ahnert; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Rivka R Colen; Camilo Jimenez; Kanwal P Raghav; Renata Ferrarotto; Shi-Ming Tu; Matthew Campbell; Linghua Wang; Sarjeel H Sabir; Coya Tapia; Chantale Bernatchez; Michael Frumovitz; Nizar Tannir; Vinod Ravi; Saria Khan; Jeane M Painter; Abulrahman Abonofal; Jing Gong; Anas Alshawa; Lacey M McQuinn; Mingxuan Xu; Sara Ahmed; Vivek Subbiah; David S Hong; Shubham Pant; Timothy A Yap; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Ecaterina E Ileana Dumbrava; Filip Janku; Siqing Fu; Richard M Simon; Kenneth R Hess; Gauri R Varadhachary; Mouhammed Amir Habra
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 13.751

View more
  3 in total

1.  A nomogram model for predicting prognosis of obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jian Lv; Yuan Yuan Liu; Yi Tao Jia; Jing Li He; Guang Yao Dai; Peng Guo; Zhao Long Zhao; Yan Ni Zhang; Zhong Xin Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Development and External Validation of a Novel Model for Predicting Postsurgical Recurrence and Overall Survival After Cytoreductive R0 Resection of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Qiaqia Li; Yinghong Deng; Wei Wei; Fan Yang; An Lin; Desheng Yao; Xiaofeng Zhu; Jundong Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Prognostic nomograms for gastric carcinoma after surgery to assist decision-making for postoperative treatment with chemotherapy cycles <9 or chemotherapy cycles ≥9.

Authors:  Yifan Li; Xiaojuan Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.