Literature DB >> 24641913

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging detects significant prostate cancer with high probability.

Lauren J Bains1, Urs E Studer2, Johannes M Froehlich1, Gianluca Giannarini2, Maria Triantafyllou1, Achim Fleischmann3, Harriet C Thoeny4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting significant prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 111 consecutive men with prostate and/or bladder cancer who underwent 3 Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis without an endorectal coil before radical prostatectomy (78) or cystoprostatectomy (33). Three independent readers blinded to clinical and pathological data assigned a prostate cancer suspicion grade based on qualitative imaging analysis. Final pathology results of prostates with and without cancer served as the reference standard. Primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting significant prostate cancer with significance defined as a largest diameter of the index lesion of 1 cm or greater, extraprostatic extension, or Gleason score 7 or greater on final pathology assessment. Secondary outcomes were interreader agreement assessed by the Fleiss κ coefficient and image reading time.
RESULTS: Of the 111 patients 93 had prostate cancer, which was significant in 80 and insignificant in 13, and 18 had no prostate cancer on final pathology results. The sensitivity and specificity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting significant PCa was 89% to 91% and 77% to 81%, respectively, for the 3 readers. Interreader agreement was good (Fleiss κ 0.65 to 0.74). Median reading time was between 13 and 18 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (3 Tesla) is a noninvasive technique that allows for the detection of significant prostate cancer with high probability without contrast medium or an endorectal coil, and with good interreader agreement and a short reading time. This technique should be further evaluated as a tool to stratify patients with prostate cancer for individualized treatment options.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnosis; differential; magnetic resonance imaging; observer variation; prostate; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24641913     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Poor standard mp-MRI and routine biopsy fail to precisely predict intraprostatic tumor localization.

Authors:  Andrea Billing; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Alexander Roosen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Elevated hardness of peripheral gland on real-time elastography is an independent marker for high-risk prostate cancers.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Jing Yao; Yehua Cai; Limin Zhang; Yishuo Wu; Jingyu Xiong; Jun Shi; Yuanyuan Wang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Risk stratification of prostate cancer in the modern era.

Authors:  Andrew S Behesnilian; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Accuracy of cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy in hitting prostate cancer-positive regions of interest.

Authors:  Yannick Cerantola; Eléonore Haberer; Jose Torres; Mona Alameldin; Samuel Aronson; Mark Levental; Franck Bladou; Maurice Anidjar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.

Authors:  Wei-Ching Lin; Valdair F Muglia; Gyl E B Silva; Salomão Chodraui Filho; Rodolfo B Reis; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Will Multi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging be the Future Tool to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Gianluca Giannarini; Michele Zazzara; Marta Rossanese; Vito Palumbo; Martina Pancot; Giuseppe Como; Maria Abbinante; Vincenzo Ficarra
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Prostate cancer detection using multiparametric 3 - tesla MRI and fusion biopsy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Thais Caldara Mussi; Rodrigo Gobbo Garcia; Marcos Roberto Gomes Queiroz; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  The diagnostic accuracy of high b-value diffusion- and T2-weighted imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tom J Syer; Keith C Godley; Donnie Cameron; Paul N Malcolm
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-07

Review 9.  The current and future role of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Radtke; Dogu Teber; Markus Hohenfellner; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.