BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The molecular mechanism underlying the clinical efficacy of FTY720-P is thought to involve persistent internalization and enhanced degradation of the S1P1 receptor subtype (S1P1R). We have investigated whether receptor binding kinetics and β-arrestin recruitment could play a role in the persistent internalization of the S1P1R by FTY720-P. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: [(3) H]-FTY720-P and [(33) P]-S1P were used to label CHO-S1P1/3Rs for binding studies. Ligand efficacy was assessed through [(35) S]-GTPγS binding and β-arrestin recruitment. Metabolic stability was evaluated using a bioassay measuring intracellular Ca(2+) release. CHO-S1P1/3R numbers were determined, following FTY720-P treatment using flow cytometry. KEY RESULTS: The kinetic off-rate of [(3) H]-FTY720-P from the S1P1R was sixfold slower than from the S1P3R, and comparable to [(33) P]-S1P dissociation from S1P1/3Rs. S1P and FTY720-P stimulated [(35) S]-GTPγS incorporation to similar degrees, but FTY720-P was over 30-fold less potent at S1P3Rs. FTY720-P stimulated a higher level of β-arrestin recruitment at S1P1Rs, 132% of the total recruited by S1P. In contrast, FTY720-P was a weak partial agonist at S1P3R, stimulating just 29% of the total β-arrestin recruited by S1P. Internalization experiments confirmed that cell surface expression of the S1P1R but not the S1P3R was reduced following a pulse exposure to FTY720-P, which is metabolically stable unlike S1P. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: FTY720-P and S1P activation of the S1P1R results in receptor internalization as a consequence of an efficient recruitment of β-arrestin. The combination of slow off-rate, efficacious β-arrestin recruitment and metabolic stability all contribute to FTY720-P's ability to promote prolonged S1P1R internalization and may be critical factors in its efficacy in the clinic.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The molecular mechanism underlying the clinical efficacy of FTY720-P is thought to involve persistent internalization and enhanced degradation of the S1P1 receptor subtype (S1P1R). We have investigated whether receptor binding kinetics and β-arrestin recruitment could play a role in the persistent internalization of the S1P1R by FTY720-P. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: [(3) H]-FTY720-P and [(33) P]-S1P were used to label CHO-S1P1/3Rs for binding studies. Ligand efficacy was assessed through [(35) S]-GTPγS binding and β-arrestin recruitment. Metabolic stability was evaluated using a bioassay measuring intracellular Ca(2+) release. CHO-S1P1/3R numbers were determined, following FTY720-P treatment using flow cytometry. KEY RESULTS: The kinetic off-rate of [(3) H]-FTY720-P from the S1P1R was sixfold slower than from the S1P3R, and comparable to [(33) P]-S1P dissociation from S1P1/3Rs. S1P and FTY720-P stimulated [(35) S]-GTPγS incorporation to similar degrees, but FTY720-P was over 30-fold less potent at S1P3Rs. FTY720-P stimulated a higher level of β-arrestin recruitment at S1P1Rs, 132% of the total recruited by S1P. In contrast, FTY720-P was a weak partial agonist at S1P3R, stimulating just 29% of the total β-arrestin recruited by S1P. Internalization experiments confirmed that cell surface expression of the S1P1R but not the S1P3R was reduced following a pulse exposure to FTY720-P, which is metabolically stable unlike S1P. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: FTY720-P and S1P activation of the S1P1R results in receptor internalization as a consequence of an efficient recruitment of β-arrestin. The combination of slow off-rate, efficacious β-arrestin recruitment and metabolic stability all contribute to FTY720-P's ability to promote prolonged S1P1R internalization and may be critical factors in its efficacy in the clinic.
Authors: Euijung Jo; M Germana Sanna; Pedro J Gonzalez-Cabrera; Shobha Thangada; Gabor Tigyi; Daniel A Osborne; Timothy Hla; Abby L Parrill; Hugh Rosen Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2005-06
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Sindy H Wei; Hugh Rosen; Melanie P Matheu; M Germana Sanna; Sheng-Kai Wang; Euijung Jo; Chi-Huey Wong; Ian Parker; Michael D Cahalan Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2005-11-06 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Hervé Le Stunff; Aki Mikami; Paola Giussani; John P Hobson; Puneet S Jolly; Sheldon Milstien; Sarah Spiegel Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-06-04 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Carmen Klein Herenbrink; David A Sykes; Prashant Donthamsetti; Meritxell Canals; Thomas Coudrat; Jeremy Shonberg; Peter J Scammells; Ben Capuano; Patrick M Sexton; Steven J Charlton; Jonathan A Javitch; Arthur Christopoulos; J Robert Lane Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Wijnand J C van der Velden; Florent X Smit; Charlotte B Christiansen; Thor C Møller; Gertrud M Hjortø; Olav Larsen; Sine P Schiellerup; Hans Bräuner-Osborne; Jens J Holst; Bolette Hartmann; Thomas M Frimurer; Mette M Rosenkilde Journal: ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci Date: 2021-01-19