Literature DB >> 24639072

Influence of equipment and settings on myocardial performance index repeatability and definition of settings to achieve optimal reproducibility.

S M Lobmaier1, M Cruz-Lemini, B Valenzuela-Alcaraz, J U Ortiz, J M Martinez, E Gratacos, F Crispi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare left myocardial performance index (MPI) values and reproducibility using different settings and ultrasound equipment in order to standardize optimal machine settings.
METHODS: Left MPI was prospectively evaluated by one observer performing conventional Doppler in 62 fetuses (28-36 weeks of gestational age) using different settings (changing sweep speed, gain and wall motion filter (WMF)) and two different ultrasound devices (Siemens Antares, Siemens; Voluson 730 Expert, GE Medical Systems). Intraclass coefficients of agreement (ICCs) were calculated using Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: Using baseline settings on the Siemens, mean (SD) MPI was 0.44 (0.05) with an ICC of 0.81. Decreasing the sweep speed resulted in decreasing average MPI values (0.43) and decreasing ICC (0.61). Lowering gain also influenced average MPI values (0.46) and ICC (0.76). Raising gain resulted in similar MPI values (0.45) with better ICC (0.90) compared with baseline settings. Raising wall motion filter (WMF) provided the best ICC (0.94) compared with the other settings. Changing the ultrasound equipment resulted in an ICC of 0.64. The optimal settings to achieve the highest reproducibility in measurement of MPI were sweep speed 8, gain 60 dB and WMF 281 Hz for Siemens Antares and sweep speed 5, gain -10 dB and WMF 210 Hz for Voluson 730 Expert.
CONCLUSION: Changing ultrasound settings or equipment may affect the calculation and repeatability of measurement of MPI values. Strict standardization of methods decreases the variability of this parameter for fetal cardiac function assessment.
Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler; MPI; Tei index; fetal echocardiography; myocardial performance index; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24639072     DOI: 10.1002/uog.13365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  9 in total

1.  Second systolic peak in fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler after intrauterine transfusion.

Authors:  Ladina Vonzun; Nicole Ochsenbein-Kölble; Dalia Balsyte; Roland Zimmermann; Markus Gonser
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  The Fetal Modified Myocardial Performance Index: Is Automation the Future?

Authors:  Priya Maheshwari; Amanda Henry; Alec W Welsh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Fetal cardiovascular alterations in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.

Authors:  Ioana Cristina Rotar; Gabriela Zaharie; Adelina Staicu; Andreia Preda; Daniel Mureşan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-01-31

Review 4.  Spectral Doppler, tissue Doppler, and speckle-tracking echocardiography for the evaluation of fetal cardiac function: an update.

Authors:  Alberto Borges Peixoto; Nathalie Jeanne Bravo-Valenzuela; Luciane Alves Rocha; Edward Araujo Júnior
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

5.  Reference values for fetal Doppler-based cardiocirculatory indices in monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancy.

Authors:  Thananan Chongsomboonsuk; Nisarat Phithakwatchara; Katika Nawapun; Sommai Viboonchart; Suparat Jaingam; Tuangsit Wataganara
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Reference ranges of fetal heart function using a Modified Myocardial Performance Index: a prospective multicentre, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lijuan Sun; Jingjing Wang; Xiaoting Su; Xinlin Chen; Yuqing Zhou; Xiaoming Zhang; Hong Lu; Jianmei Niu; Lan Yu; Congxin Sun; Wenjun Zhang; Jijing Han; Lina Zhang; Zhenna Wang; Peiwen Chen; Tiantian Chen; Hua Hong; Lulu Zhou; Baoying Ye; Wei Guo; Wei Zhao; Na Zhang; Zhen Li; Sheng Zhao; Qingqing Wu; Jiawei Tian; Yuxin Jiang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Development and validation of an app-based cell counter for use in the clinical laboratory setting.

Authors:  Alexander C Thurman; Jessica L Davis; Max Jan; Charles E McCulloch; Benjamin D Buelow
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-01-29

8.  Fetal biometric parameters: Reference charts for a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Brazil.

Authors:  Alberto Borges Peixoto; Taciana Mara Rodrigues da Cunha Caldas; Fernando Felix Dulgheroff; Wellington P Martins; Edward Araujo Júnior
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2017-03-31

9.  A novel index equivalent to the myocardial performance index for right ventricular functional assessment in children and adolescent patients.

Authors:  Yasunobu Hayabuchi; Yukako Homma; Shoji Kagami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.