Literature DB >> 24636448

Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems.

Lei Gao1, A K Bourke2, John Nelson2.   

Abstract

Physical activity has a positive impact on people's well-being and it had been shown to decrease the occurrence of chronic diseases in the older adult population. To date, a substantial amount of research studies exist, which focus on activity recognition using inertial sensors. Many of these studies adopt a single sensor approach and focus on proposing novel features combined with complex classifiers to improve the overall recognition accuracy. In addition, the implementation of the advanced feature extraction algorithms and the complex classifiers exceed the computing ability of most current wearable sensor platforms. This paper proposes a method to adopt multiple sensors on distributed body locations to overcome this problem. The objective of the proposed system is to achieve higher recognition accuracy with "light-weight" signal processing algorithms, which run on a distributed computing based sensor system comprised of computationally efficient nodes. For analysing and evaluating the multi-sensor system, eight subjects were recruited to perform eight normal scripted activities in different life scenarios, each repeated three times. Thus a total of 192 activities were recorded resulting in 864 separate annotated activity states. The methods for designing such a multi-sensor system required consideration of the following: signal pre-processing algorithms, sampling rate, feature selection and classifier selection. Each has been investigated and the most appropriate approach is selected to achieve a trade-off between recognition accuracy and computing execution time. A comparison of six different systems, which employ single or multiple sensors, is presented. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed multi-sensor system can achieve an overall recognition accuracy of 96.4% by adopting the mean and variance features, using the Decision Tree classifier. The results demonstrate that elaborate classifiers and feature sets are not required to achieve high recognition accuracies on a multi-sensor system.
Copyright © 2014 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Activities of daily living; Activity recognition; Multi-sensor fusion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24636448     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  32 in total

Review 1.  The Elderly's Independent Living in Smart Homes: A Characterization of Activities and Sensing Infrastructure Survey to Facilitate Services Development.

Authors:  Qin Ni; Ana Belén García Hernando; Iván Pau de la Cruz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  Progress in Biomedical Knowledge Discovery: A 25-year Retrospective.

Authors:  L Sacchi; J H Holmes
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-02

3.  Activity Monitoring with a Wrist-Worn, Accelerometer-Based Device.

Authors:  Wen-Yen Lin; Vijay Kumar Verma; Ming-Yih Lee; Chao-Sung Lai
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  A smartwatch-based framework for real-time and online assessment and mobility monitoring.

Authors:  Matin Kheirkhahan; Sanjay Nair; Anis Davoudi; Parisa Rashidi; Amal A Wanigatunga; Duane B Corbett; Tonatiuh Mendoza; Todd M Manini; Sanjay Ranka
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Validation of Biofeedback Wearables for Photoplethysmographic Heart Rate Tracking.

Authors:  Edward Jo; Kiana Lewis; Dean Directo; Michael J Kim; Brett A Dolezal
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  OpiTrack: A Wearable-based Clinical Opioid Use Tracker with Temporal Convolutional Attention Networks.

Authors:  Bhanu Teja Gullapalli; Stephanie Carreiro; Brittany P Chapman; Deepak Ganesan; Jan Sjoquist; Tauhidur Rahman
Journal:  Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol       Date:  2021-09-14

7.  Posture and Physical Activity Detection: Impact of Number of Sensors and Feature Type.

Authors:  Q U Tang; Dinesh John; Binod Thapa-Chhetry; Diego Jose Arguello; Stephen Intille
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-08

Review 8.  Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Ferhat Attal; Samer Mohammed; Mariam Dedabrishvili; Faicel Chamroukhi; Latifa Oukhellou; Yacine Amirat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  A Compressed Sensing-Based Wearable Sensor Network for Quantitative Assessment of Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Lei Yu; Daxi Xiong; Liquan Guo; Jiping Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Windows Into Human Health Through Wearables Data Analytics.

Authors:  Daniel Witt; Ryan Kellogg; Michael Snyder; Jessilyn Dunn
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.