OBJECTIVES: To assess whether different Timed Up and Go (TUG) subtasks are affected differently in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and are specific to different cognitive abilities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Community and home. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults without dementia (N = 347; mean age 83.6 ± 3.5, 75% female, 19.3% with MCI) participating in the Rush Memory and Aging Project. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects wore a small, light-weight sensor that measured acceleration and angular velocity while they performed the instrumented TUG (iTUG). Measures of iTUG were derived from four subtasks (walking, turning, sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit) and compared between participants with MCI and those with no cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Participants with no cognitive impairment and those with MCI did not differ in age (P = .90), sex (P = .80), years of education (P = .48) or time to complete the TUG (no cognitive impairment 7.6 ± 3.7 seconds; MCI 8.4 ± 3.7 seconds; P = .12). Participants with MCI had less walking consistency (P = .009), smaller pitch range during transitions (P = .005), lower angular velocity during turning (P = .04) and required more time to complete the turn-to-walk (P = .04). Gait consistency was correlated with perceptual speed (P = .01), and turning was correlated with perceptual speed (P = .02) and visual-spatial abilities (P = .049). CONCLUSION: Mild cognitive impairment is associated with impaired performance on iTUG subtasks that cannot be identified when simply measuring overall duration of performance. Distinctive iTUG tasks were related to particular cognitive domains, demonstrating the specificity of motor-cognitive interactions. Using a single sensor worn on the body for quantification of mobility may facilitate understanding of late-life gait impairments and their interrelationship with cognitive decline.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether different Timed Up and Go (TUG) subtasks are affected differently in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and are specific to different cognitive abilities. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Community and home. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults without dementia (N = 347; mean age 83.6 ± 3.5, 75% female, 19.3% with MCI) participating in the Rush Memory and Aging Project. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects wore a small, light-weight sensor that measured acceleration and angular velocity while they performed the instrumented TUG (iTUG). Measures of iTUG were derived from four subtasks (walking, turning, sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit) and compared between participants with MCI and those with no cognitive impairment. RESULTS:Participants with no cognitive impairment and those with MCI did not differ in age (P = .90), sex (P = .80), years of education (P = .48) or time to complete the TUG (no cognitive impairment 7.6 ± 3.7 seconds; MCI 8.4 ± 3.7 seconds; P = .12). Participants with MCI had less walking consistency (P = .009), smaller pitch range during transitions (P = .005), lower angular velocity during turning (P = .04) and required more time to complete the turn-to-walk (P = .04). Gait consistency was correlated with perceptual speed (P = .01), and turning was correlated with perceptual speed (P = .02) and visual-spatial abilities (P = .049). CONCLUSION: Mild cognitive impairment is associated with impaired performance on iTUG subtasks that cannot be identified when simply measuring overall duration of performance. Distinctive iTUG tasks were related to particular cognitive domains, demonstrating the specificity of motor-cognitive interactions. Using a single sensor worn on the body for quantification of mobility may facilitate understanding of late-life gait impairments and their interrelationship with cognitive decline.
Authors: Charles A Odonkor; Julia C Thomas; Nicole Holt; Nancy Latham; Jessie Vanswearingen; Jennifer Sokol Brach; Suzanne G Leveille; Alan Jette; Jonathan Bean Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Orna A Donoghue; N Frances Horgan; George M Savva; Hilary Cronin; Claire O'Regan; Rose Anne Kenny Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jessica Battisto; Katharina V Echt; Steven L Wolf; Paul Weiss; Madeleine E Hackney Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Lisa L Barnes; Robert S Wilson; Julie A Schneider Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Aner Weiss; Talia Herman; Anat Mirelman; Shirley Shema Shiratzky; Nir Giladi; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Jeffrey M Hausdorff Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2018-10-21 Impact factor: 2.840