Literature DB >> 24635099

There is more to pollinator-mediated selection than pollen limitation.

Nina Sletvold1, Jon Agren.   

Abstract

Spatial variation in pollinator-mediated selection (Δβpoll ) is a major driver of floral diversification, but we lack a quantitative understanding of its link to pollen limitation (PL) and net selection on floral traits. For 2-5 years, we quantified Δβpoll on floral traits in two populations each of two orchid species differing in PL. In both species, spatiotemporal variation in Δβpoll explained much of the variation in net selection. Selection was consistently stronger and the proportion that was pollinator-mediated was higher in the severely pollen-limited deceptive species than in the rewarding species. Within species, variation in PL could not explain variation in Δβpoll for any trait, indicating that factors influencing the functional relationship between trait variation and pollination success govern a major part of the observed variation in Δβpoll . Separating the effects of variation in mean interaction intensity and in the functional significance of traits will be necessary to understand spatiotemporal variation in selection exerted by the biotic environment.
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Dactylorhiza lapponica; Gymnadenia conopsea; floral evolution; natural selection; plant-animal interactions; spatiotemporal variation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24635099     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Phenotypic Selection in Halenia elliptica D. Don (Gentianaceae), an Alpine Biennial with Mixed Mating System.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Huang; Minyu Chen; Linlin Wang; Mingliu Yang; Nacai Yang; Zhonghu Li; Yuanwen Duan
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Divergent selection on flowering phenology but not on floral morphology between two closely related orchids.

Authors:  Elodie Chapurlat; Iris Le Roncé; Jon Ågren; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Floral Scents of a Deceptive Plant Are Hyperdiverse and Under Population-Specific Phenotypic Selection.

Authors:  Eva Gfrerer; Danae Laina; Marc Gibernau; Roman Fuchs; Martin Happ; Till Tolasch; Wolfgang Trutschnig; Anja C Hörger; Hans Peter Comes; Stefan Dötterl
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Effects of pollination limitation and seed predation on female reproductive success of a deceptive orchid.

Authors:  Ryan P Walsh; Paige M Arnold; Helen J Michaels
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Fluctuating selection across years and phenotypic variation in food-deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Nicolas Juillet; Christian Lexer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.