Literature DB >> 24634281

Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon.

O V Vyazovska1, Y Teng, E A Wasserman.   

Abstract

We deployed the Multiple Necessary Cues (MNC) discrimination task to see if pigeons can simultaneously attend to four different dimensions of complex visual stimuli. Specifically, we trained nine pigeons (Columba livia) on a go/no go discrimination to peck only 1 of 16 compound stimuli created from all possible combinations of two stimulus values from four separable visual dimensions: shape (circle/square), size (large/small), line orientation (horizontal/vertical), and brightness (dark/light). Some of the pigeons had CLHD (circle, large, horizontal, dark) as the positive stimulus (S+), whereas others had SSVL (square, small, vertical, light) as the S+. We recorded touchscreen pecking during the first 15 s that each stimulus was presented on each training trial. Discrimination training continued until pigeons' rates of responding to all 15 negative stimuli (S-s) fell to less than 15% of their response rates to the S+. All pigeons acquired the MNC discrimination, suggesting that they attended to all four dimensions of the multidimensional stimuli. Learning rate was similar for all four dimensions, indicating equivalent salience of the discriminative stimuli. The more dimensions along which the S-s differed from the S+, the faster was discrimination learning, suggesting an added benefit from increasing perceptual disparities of the S-s from the S+. Finally, evidence of attentional tradeoffs among the four dimensions was seen during discrimination learning, raising interesting questions concerning the possible control of behavior by elemental and configural stimuli. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attentional tradeoff; configural stimulus control; dimensional stimulus control; discrimination learning; pigeon; touchscreen pecking; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24634281     DOI: 10.1002/jeab.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; F Gregory Ashby; J David Smith; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  The effect of dimensional reinforcement prediction on discrimination of compound visual stimuli by pigeons.

Authors:  O V Vyazovska
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.

Authors:  Victor M Navarro; Ridhi Jani; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Assessing Attention in Category Learning by Animals.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Leyre Castro
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20

5.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Untrained birds' ability to recognise predators with changed body size and colouration in a field experiment.

Authors:  Kateřina Antonová; Petr Veselý; Roman Fuchs
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.