Literature DB >> 24634094

High satisfaction yet decreased activity 4 years after transphyseal ACL reconstruction.

Gregory A Schmale1, Christopher Kweon, Roger V Larson, Viviana Bompadre.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ACL injuries in preteens and teens are common occurrences. Reconstruction is believed to be optimum treatment for those wishing to return to running, cutting, and jumping sports. Rates of reoperation, satisfaction, and long-term return to and maintenance of preinjury activity after ACL reconstruction in young athletes are important information for physicians, patients, and parents. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were to address the following questions in this skeletally immature patient population undergoing ACL reconstruction: (1) What is the reinjury rate and the need for subsequent surgeries? (2) How do patient satisfaction and function as assessed by patient and physician correlate with return to sport? (3) What factors contribute to failure to return to preinjury activity levels?
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 29 patients who underwent transphyseal ACL reconstruction using soft tissue grafts passed through open physes and followed to skeletal maturity, and at least 2 years from their index surgery, who were invited and returned for a study interview and examination. Pre- and postinjury activity levels were assessed via the Tegner activity score, satisfaction was determined using a 10-point Likert scale, function was assessed via the Lysholm score and IKDC grade, and an open-ended questionnaire was used for explanations of changes in activity levels. Reoperations were classified as major or minor, determined from a review of the medical records conducted after interview and examination.
RESULTS: At a minimum followup of 2 years (mean, 4 years; range, 2-8 years), four revision reconstructions and seven minor operations were performed for a reoperation rate of 11 of 29 (38%). Eight of 29 patients (28%) sustained contralateral ACL ruptures. The mean satisfaction score was 9 (range, 4-10) and mean Lysholm score was 91 (range, 61-100). Only 12 of 29 (41%) patients returned to and maintained their preinjury level of sport. High satisfaction correlated with return to prior level of sports, although there was no relationship between function and activity level. Reoperation on the index knee or contralateral ACL tear did not correlate with a change in activity level; rather, most patients who were less active indicated a change in interest with advancing age.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite high satisfaction and function, less than 50% of patients maintained their preinjury level of play 4 years after ACL reconstruction. Satisfaction correlated significantly with knee function; highly satisfied patients were more likely to return to and maintain their prior level of participation in sports. Contributing factors to decreased activity include changes in lifestyle with increasing age. Reoperation did not correlate with lower activity scores or failure to return to sports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24634094      PMCID: PMC4048436          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3561-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  41 in total

1.  The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes. A prospective study.

Authors:  T E Hewett; T N Lindenfeld; J V Riccobene; F R Noyes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Prospective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Joshua G Schkrohowsky; Zachary M Working; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Ipsilateral graft and contralateral ACL rupture at five years or more following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Robert A Magnussen; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.

Authors:  J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Management and complications of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in skeletally immature patients: survey of the Herodicus Society and The ACL Study Group.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; Hillary S Saxon; W David Hovis; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with transphyseal tunnels.

Authors:  Lauren H Redler; Rebecca T Brafman; Natasha Trentacosta; Christopher S Ahmad
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: function testing.

Authors:  S D Barber; F R Noyes; R Mangine; M DeMaio
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chadwick Prodromos; Brian Joyce; Kelvin Shi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 4.114

10.  Patient-focused measures of functional health status and health-related quality of life in pediatric orthopedics: a case study in measurement selection.

Authors:  William Furlong; Ronald D Barr; David Feeny; Suzanne Yandow
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes.

Authors:  Devin C Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients.

Authors:  Andrew Pennock; Michael M Murphy; Mark Wu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-12

3.  Relationships Between Age at Menarche, Walking Gait Base of Support, and Stance Phase Frontal Plane Knee Biomechanics in Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Andrew W Froehle; Kimberly A Grannis; Richard J Sherwood; Dana L Duren
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Obesity is associated with poorer range of motion and Tegner scores following hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Asians.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Hwei-Chi Chong; Hwee-Chye Andrew Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-08

5.  Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 6.  Over 90 % of children and adolescents return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey Kay; Muzammil Memon; Robert G Marx; Devin Peterson; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Clinical Outcome Reporting in Youth ACL Literature Is Widely Variable.

Authors:  Christopher M Brusalis; Nikita Lakomkin; Joash R Suryavanshi; Aristides I Cruz; Daniel W Green; Kristofer J Jones; Peter D Fabricant
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-11

8.  One in 5 Athletes Sustain Reinjury Upon Return to High-Risk Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review in 1239 Athletes Younger Than 20 Years.

Authors:  Sue Barber-Westin; Frank R Noyes
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Risk Factors for Contra-Lateral Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Cronström; Eva Tengman; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Psychological factors are important to return to pre-injury sport activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: expect and motivate to satisfy.

Authors:  Sofi Sonesson; Joanna Kvist; Clare Ardern; Annika Österberg; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.