Elizabeth Siantz1, María P Aranda2. 1. University of Southern Californa School of Social Work. Electronic address: siantz@usc.edu. 2. University of Southern Californa School of Social Work.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: While there is strong evidence in support of chronic disease self-management programs, much less is available with regard to individuals living with serious mental illness (SMI). The objectives of this review are to identify and appraise chronic disease self-management studies tested with samples of US adults living with SMI. We include an appraisal of methodological quality of the chronic disease self-management (CDSM) studies that met our final criteria. METHODS: Systematic search methods were utilized to identify intervention studies published before 2012 that describe CDSM outcomes for adults with SMI. RESULTS: Eighteen unduplicated articles were identified that included outcomes of CDSM studies, while 10 met all inclusion criteria. Favorable treatment effects were observed for adults with SMI across 10 studies that took place in different types of clinical settings. CDSM studies that met all search criteria had a wide range of methodological quality, indicating that this is a nascent field of study. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high chronic disease burden experienced by individuals with SMI combined with our nations health care reform, emphasis on self-management to improve population health, coupled with advancing the quality of research to evaluate CDSM programs for adults with SMI, is critically needed.
OBJECTIVE: While there is strong evidence in support of chronic disease self-management programs, much less is available with regard to individuals living with serious mental illness (SMI). The objectives of this review are to identify and appraise chronic disease self-management studies tested with samples of US adults living with SMI. We include an appraisal of methodological quality of the chronic disease self-management (CDSM) studies that met our final criteria. METHODS: Systematic search methods were utilized to identify intervention studies published before 2012 that describe CDSM outcomes for adults with SMI. RESULTS: Eighteen unduplicated articles were identified that included outcomes of CDSM studies, while 10 met all inclusion criteria. Favorable treatment effects were observed for adults with SMI across 10 studies that took place in different types of clinical settings. CDSM studies that met all search criteria had a wide range of methodological quality, indicating that this is a nascent field of study. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high chronic disease burden experienced by individuals with SMI combined with our nations health care reform, emphasis on self-management to improve population health, coupled with advancing the quality of research to evaluate CDSM programs for adults with SMI, is critically needed.
Authors: Karen L Whiteman; John A Naslund; Elizabeth A DiNapoli; Martha L Bruce; Stephen J Bartels Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Amy M Kilbourne; Michelle M Barbaresso; Zongshan Lai; Kristina M Nord; Margretta Bramlet; David E Goodrich; Edward P Post; Daniel Almirall; Mark S Bauer Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Manasvini Singh; Silke A von Esenwein; Gretl E Glick; Stephanie Tapscott; Sherry Jenkins Tucker; Cathy A Lally; Evelina W Sterling Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Carol Blixen; Martha Sajatovic; David J Moore; Colin Depp; Clint Cushman; Jamie Cage; Marina Barboza; Logan Eskew; Peter Klein; Jennifer B Levin Journal: Int J Healthc Date: 2018