Literature DB >> 24630884

Drug-eluting balloons for the treatment of the superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis: 2-year follow-up.

Vittorio Virga1, Eugenio Stabile2, Giancarlo Biamino3, Luigi Salemme3, Angelo Cioppa3, Giuseppe Giugliano4, Tullio Tesorio3, Linda Cota3, Grigore Popusoi3, Armando Pucciarelli3, Giovanni Esposito3, Bruno Trimarco4, Paolo Rubino3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective registry was to evaluate the safety and efficacy at 2-year follow-up of the use of drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) for the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) in-stent restenosis (ISR).
BACKGROUND: The use of DEBs for the treatment of SFA ISR is associated with a satisfactory primary patency rate at 1 year, but no data are available for longer follow-up. Unfortunately, when DEBs were used to treat SFA de novo lesions, the occurrence of restenosis increased by 50% between the first and the second years of follow-up.
METHODS: From December 2009 to December 2010, 39 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of SFA ISR at our institution (Clinica Montevergine, Mercogliano, Italy). All patients underwent conventional SFA percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and final post-dilation with paclitaxel-eluting balloons (IN.PACT, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). Patients were evaluated for up to 24 months.
RESULTS: During follow-up, 1 patient died of heart failure and another of sudden death, for a 2-years rate of cardiovascular mortality rate of 5.12 %. The primary patency rate at 2 years was 70.3% (11 of 37 patients experienced restenosis recurrence at 2-year follow-up). The treatment of complex ISR lesions (classes II and III) was associated with an increased rate of recurrent restenosis compared with class I (33.3 % and 36.3 % vs. 12.5%; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that adjunctive use of DEBs for the treatment of SFA ISR is a safe and effective therapeutic strategy up to 2 years of follow-up.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug-eluting balloon; in-stent restenosis; superficial femoral artery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24630884     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Arun K Thukkani; Scott Kinlay
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Drug-coated balloons: how should we incorporate into our practice in treating superficial femoral artery lesions?

Authors:  Thomas Zeller; Aljoscha Rastan; Roland Macharzina; Ulrich Beschorner; Elias Noory
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-05

Review 3.  Intermittent claudication due to peripheral artery disease: best modern medical and endovascular therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Taisei Kobayashi; Sahil A Parikh; Jay Giri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

Authors:  Saurabh Mehrotra; Ganesh Paramasivam; Sundeep Mishra
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Novel Approaches to the Management of Advanced Peripheral Artery Disease: Perspectives on Drug-Coated Balloons, Drug-Eluting Stents, and Bioresorbable Scaffolds.

Authors:  Thomas Zeller; Aljoscha Rastan; Roland Macharzina; Ulrich Beschorner; Elias Noory
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Drug-eluting balloon treatment in femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis of different lengths.

Authors:  Berkan Özpak; Mustafa Çağdaş Çayır
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 0.332

7.  Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial.

Authors:  Gunnar Tepe; John Laird; Peter Schneider; Marianne Brodmann; Prakash Krishnan; Antonio Micari; Christopher Metzger; Dierk Scheinert; Thomas Zeller; David J Cohen; David B Snead; Beaux Alexander; Mario Landini; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  ISAR-PEBIS (Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for In-Stent Restenosis of Superficial Femoral Artery): A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ilka Ott; Salvatore Cassese; Philipp Groha; Birgit Steppich; Felix Voll; Martin Hadamitzky; Tareq Ibrahim; Sebastian Kufner; Karl Dewitz; Theresa Wittmann; Albert Markus Kasel; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Heribert Schunkert; Adnan Kastrati; Massimiliano Fusaro
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Cost-effectiveness of superficial femoral artery endovascular interventions in the UK and Germany: a modelling study.

Authors:  Benjamin C Kearns; Steven M Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes of Peripheral Drug-Coated Balloon in High-Risk Patients with Femoropopliteal Disease.

Authors:  Shih-Jung Jang; Chien-An Hsieh; Hsuan-Li Huang; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Hsin-Hua Chou; Chueh-Yung Tsao; Tien-Yu Wu; Yu-Lin Ko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.