Literature DB >> 24630789

Outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with clopidogrel versus prasugrel (from the INFUSE-AMI trial).

Sorin J Brener1, Keith G Oldroyd2, Akiko Maehara3, Magdi El-Omar4, Bernhard Witzenbichler5, Ke Xu3, Roxana Mehran6, C Michael Gibson7, Gregg W Stone8.   

Abstract

Prasugrel is more potent than clopidogrel, but it is not known whether this translates into clinical benefit in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bivalirudin for ST elevation myocardial infarction. In the Intracoronary Abciximab and Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients With Large Anterior Myocardial Infarction trial, 452 patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary PCI with bivalirudin were randomized to intralesional abciximab or placebo and to thrombus aspiration or no aspiration. Clopidogrel or prasugrel were administered at physician discretion. The primary end point was infarct size at 30 days by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical events at 30 days and 1 year were independently adjudicated. Propensity score was used to adjust for nonrandom allocation of the drugs. Prasugrel and clopidogrel were administered to 155 patients (34.3%) and 297 patients (65.7%), respectively. Patients receiving prasugrel were younger with higher left ventricular ejection fraction and greater use of drug-eluting stents. Prasugrel-treated patients had higher rates of procedural success (94% vs 89%, p = 0.03), Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow (95% vs 90%, p = 0.06), and lower corrected TIMI frame counts (21 ± 6 vs 23 ± 11, p = 0.008). At 30 days, infarct size was marginally lower in the prasugrel group (median [interquartile range] = 16.4% [6.5 to 20.0] vs 17.6% [8.1 to 25.7], p = 0.06). At 1 year, prasugrel group had significantly fewer deaths (1.3% vs 8.3%, p = 0.004) and fewer episodes of severe heart failure (2.0% vs 7.7%, p = 0.02). These findings persisted after propensity score adjustment. There were no significant differences in major bleeding. Stent thrombosis was 0% versus 2.5%, respectively, p = 0.054. We conclude that prasugrel was associated with improved efficacy and similar safety compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary PCI with bivalirudin.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24630789     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current antiplatelet agents: place in therapy and role of genetic testing.

Authors:  Eugene Yang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Novel oral P2Y12 inhibitor prasugrel vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome: evidence based on 6 studies.

Authors:  Min Jia; Zaibo Li; Hongtao Chu; Lin Li; Keyong Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 3.  Efficacy and Safety of Novel Oral P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jianjun Sun; Qian Xiang; Chao Li; Zining Wang; Kun Hu; Qiufen Xie; Yimin Cui
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Efficacy and safety of newer P2Y12 inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Fei; Cheuk Kiu Lam; Bernard Man Yung Cheung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor on prevention of stent thrombosis in patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenwen Chen; Chen Zhang; Jian Zhao; Xiuxiu Xu; Heqin Dang; Qiang Xiao; Yuanmin Li; Haifeng Hou
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Infarct Size Following Treatment With Second- Versus Third-Generation P2Y12 Antagonists in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease at ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the CvLPRIT Study.

Authors:  Jamal N Khan; John P Greenwood; Sheraz A Nazir; Florence Y Lai; Miles Dalby; Nick Curzen; Simon Hetherington; Damian J Kelly; Daniel Blackman; Charles Peebles; Joyce Wong; Marcus Flather; Howard Swanton; Anthony H Gershlick; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Comparison of Clopidogrel With Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Clinical Outcomes From the National Cardiovascular Database ACTION Registry.

Authors:  Mohamed Khayata; Joseph N Gabra; M Farhan Nasser; George I Litman; Shyam Bhakta; Rupesh Raina
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2017-06-30

Review 8.  Post percutaneous coronary interventional adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events observed with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: direct comparison through a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pravesh Kumar Bundhun; Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Type 1 Myocardial Infarction With a Focus on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Reid; Ahmed Alturki; Andrew Yan; Derek So; Dennis Ko; Jean-Francois Tanguay; Amal Bessissow; Shamir Mehta; Shaun Goodman; Thao Huynh
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-02-24

10.  Clustering of ABCB1 and CYP2C19 Genetic Variants Predicts Risk of Major Bleeding and Thrombotic Events in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and Clopidogrel.

Authors:  Roberta Galeazzi; Fabiola Olivieri; Liana Spazzafumo; Giuseppina Rose; Alberto Montesanto; Simona Giovagnetti; Sara Cecchini; Gelsomina Malatesta; Raffaele Di Pillo; Roberto Antonicelli
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.