Literature DB >> 24630539

Dose-response relationship with clinical outcome for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered via online image guidance.

Larry Kestin1, Inga Grills2, Matthias Guckenberger3, Jose Belderbos4, Andrew J Hope5, Maria Werner-Wasik6, Jan-Jakob Sonke4, Jean-Pierre Bissonnette5, Ying Xiao6, Di Yan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine potential dose-response relationships with various non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) SBRT fractionation regimens delivered with online CT-based image guidance.
METHODS: 505 tumors in 483 patients with clinical stage T1-T2N0 NSCLC were treated with SBRT using on-line cone-beam-CT-based image guidance at 5 institutions (1998-2010). Median maximum tumor dimension was 2.6 cm (range 0.9-8.5 cm). Dose fractionation prescription was according to each institution's protocol with the most common schedules of 18-20 GyX3, 12 GyX4, 12 GyX5, 12.5 GyX3, 7.5 GyX8 (median = 54 Gy, 3 fractions). Median prescription (Rx) BED10 = 132 Gy (50.4-180). Median values (Gy) of 3D planned doses for BED10 were GTV(min) = 164.1, GTV(mean) = 188.4, GTV(max) = 205.9, PTV(min) = 113.9, PTV D99 = 123.9, PTV(mean) = 164.7, PTV D1 = 197.3, PTV(max) = 210.7. Mean follow-up = 1.6 years.
RESULTS: 26 cases (5%) had local recurrence (LR) for a 2-year rate of 6% and 3-year rate of 9%. All BED10 GTV&amp;PTV endpoints were associated with LR as continuous variables on univariate analysis (p<0.05). Rx and PTV(mean) dose appeared to have the highest correlation with LR with area under ROC curve of 0.69 and 0.65 respectively and optimal cut points of 105 and 125 Gy, respectively. 2-year LR was 4% for PTV(mean)>125 vs 17% for <125 Gy (p<0.01) with sensitivity = 84% and specificity = 57% for predicting LR. 2-year LR for Rx BED10>105 was 4% vs 15% for <105 Gy (p<0.01). Longer treatment duration (⩾ 11 elapsed days) demonstrated a 2-year LR of 14% vs 4% for ⩽ 10 days (p<0.01). GTV size was associated with LR on univariate analysis as a continuous variable (p = 0.02) with 2-year LR = 3% for <2.7 cm vs 9% for ⩾ 2.7 cm (p = 0.03). BED10 (p = 0.01) and elapsed days during RT (p = 0.05) were independent predictors on multivariate analysis as continuous variables.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial dose-response relationship for local control of NSCLC following image-guided SBRT with optimal PTV(mean) BED10>125 Gy. Shorter treatment duration was also associated with better local control in this dataset.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose response; Image-guided radiotherapy; Lung cancer; Stereotactic body radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24630539     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  29 in total

1.  A pooled analysis of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: is failure to recruit patients into randomized trials also an answer to the research question?

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Nicolaus H Andratschke; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-07

2.  Guideline for radiotherapy with curative intent in patients with early-stage medically inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C B Falkson; E T Vella; E Yu; M El-Mallah; R Mackenzie; P M Ellis; Y C Ung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Radiobiology of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Miquel Macià I Garau
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-03-23

4.  A Histologic Basis for the Efficacy of SBRT to the lung.

Authors:  Neil M Woody; Kevin L Stephans; Martin Andrews; Tingliang Zhuang; Priyanka Gopal; Ping Xia; Carol F Farver; Daniel P Raymond; Craig D Peacock; Joseph Cicenia; Chandana A Reddy; Gregory M M Videtic; Mohamed E Abazeed
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Predicting 5-Year Progression and Survival Outcomes for Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Development and Validation of Robust Prognostic Nomograms.

Authors:  Jingjing Kang; Matthew S Ning; Han Feng; Hongqi Li; Houda Bahig; Eric D Brooks; James W Welsh; Rui Ye; Hongyu Miao; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The significance of PTV dose coverage on cancer control outcomes in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with highly ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Narek Shaverdian; Stephen Tenn; Darlene Veruttipong; Jason Wang; John Hegde; Chul Lee; Minsong Cao; Nzhde Agazaryan; Michael Steinberg; Patrick Kupelian; Percy Lee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pulmonary metastases from renal cell carcinoma-a multicenter analysis of the German working group "Stereotactic Radiotherapy".

Authors:  Juliane Hoerner-Rieber; Marciana Duma; Oliver Blanck; Guido Hildebrandt; Andrea Wittig; Fabian Lohaus; Michael Flentje; Frederick Mantel; Robert Krempien; Michael J Eble; Klaus Henning Kahl; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Stefan Rieken; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Impact of dose to lung outside the planning target volume on distant metastasis or progression after SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ryan T Hughes; Cole R Steber; Travis J Jacobson; Michael K Farris
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  Stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Ricardi; Serena Badellino; Andrea Riccardo Filippi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2015-06-30

10.  Five- Versus Ten-Fraction Regimens of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary and Metastatic NSCLC.

Authors:  Cole R Steber; Ryan T Hughes; Michael H Soike; Travis Jacobson; Corbin A Helis; Joshua C Farris; Michael K Farris
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.785

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.