Literature DB >> 24629552

Providers role in colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

Prakash Ramdass1, Paul Petraro2, Christina Via3, Armin Shahrokni4, Haq Nawaz5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine predictors of provider recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC).
METHODS: We examined proportions of patients without prior screening for colonoscopy and their willingness to get a colonoscopy if recommended by a healthcare provider.
RESULTS: The rate of CRC screening with a colonoscopy within the recommended guidelines was 35%; provider recommendation rate for colonoscopy screening was 34.9%; and never-screened patients would receive a colonoscopy 78% when recommended by a provider. Provider recommendation was the best predictor for receiving a screening colonoscopy (OR 4.19; 95% CI, 1.91-9.22, p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Physician recommendation for colonoscopy is the most effective strategy to promote screening colonoscopy in the US, but only one third of eligible patients recall such counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629552     DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.38.2.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Behav        ISSN: 1087-3244


  10 in total

1.  Understanding lung cancer screening behaviour using path analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; James E Slaven; Patrick O Monahan; Claire Burke Draucker; Emilee Vode; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Neighborhood Satisfaction and Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community Sample of African Americans.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Cathy Melvin; Vanessa Briggs; Ernestine Delmoor; LaShanta J Rice; Cheryl Lynch; Melanie Jefferson; Jerry C Johnson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-02

3.  Lung Cancer Screening Participation: Developing a Conceptual Model to Guide Research.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Lorie L Davis; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Can we achieve an 80% screening rate for colorectal cancer by 2018 in the United States?

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Fadlo R Khuri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Assessing the impact of colonoscopy complications on use of colonoscopy among primary care physicians and other connected physicians: an observational study of older Americans.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; A James O'Malley; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Claire Burke Draucker; Susan M Rawl; Emilee Vode; Lisa Carter-Harris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Arlinda Ruco; Fahima Dossa; Jill Tinmouth; Diego Llovet; Teruko Kishibe; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Engaging traditional medicine providers in colorectal cancer screening education in a chinese american community: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Adam Burke; Janice Y Tsoh; Gem M Le; Susan Stewart; Ginny Gildengorin; Ching Wong; Elaine Chow; Kent Woo; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  The effect of the Affordable Care Act on patient out-of-pocket cost and use of preventive cancer screenings in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Maria Steenland; Anna Sinaiko; Amy Glynn; Therese Fitzgerald; Jessica Cohen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-06-21

10.  Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Florence K L Tangka; Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Barry I Graubard; Nancy Breen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.830

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.