Literature DB >> 24627664

Aerobic energy expenditure during recreational weight training in females and males.

Beth Morgan1, Sarah J Woodruff1, Peter M Tiidus1.   

Abstract

The influence of gender on aerobic energy expenditure (EE) during weight training has not been systematically researched. We determined the absolute and relative EE during the performance of two weight training programs of different intensities, durations and total work in males and females. Eight male and seven female recreational weight trainers (20-29 y) completed two randomly ordered weight training sessions involving 2 sets of 8 standard upper and lower body lifts at a set cadence separated by 45 seconds rest between sets and lifts (48 hrs apart). Heavy (H) at 100% 8 Repetition Maximum (8RM), 8 reps, ~19 min duration and light (L) at 85% 8RM, 15 reps, ~23 min duration. VO2 was determined continuously throughout the training sessions. Lean body mass (LBM) was estimated from skin fold measures and body weight. Energy expenditure was estimated from breath-by-breath metabolic measurements using portable metabolic assessment equipment (Cosmed K4b(2)). Absolute EE (total kJ) and rate of energy expenditure per minute (kJ per min) were not significantly different between H and L intensities and male and female subjects. The rate of EE averaged between approximately 10-12 kJ per min. However, relative EE (J per kg LBM per min per unit work) were significantly higher (p < 0.02) for females compared to males in both H: (26.46±8.06 females vs 14.36±3.02 males) and L: (19.91±4.28 females vs. 9.83±3.28 males), intensities. It was concluded that females rely on a greater relative aerobic EE than males when performing recreational type weight lifting programs.

Keywords:  Weight training; aerobic energy expenditure; gender

Year:  2003        PMID: 24627664      PMCID: PMC3942638     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  9 in total

Review 1.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.

Authors:  William J Kraemer; Kent Adams; Enzo Cafarelli; Gary A Dudley; Cathryn Dooly; Matthew S Feigenbaum; Steven J Fleck; Barry Franklin; Andrew C Fry; Jay R Hoffman; Robert U Newton; Jeffrey Potteiger; Michael H Stone; Nicholas A Ratamess; Travis Triplett-McBride
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 2.  Energy expenditure and fuel selection in biological systems: the theory and practice of calculations based on indirect calorimetry and tracer methods.

Authors:  M Elia; G Livesey
Journal:  World Rev Nutr Diet       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 0.575

3.  Gender differences in substrate for endurance exercise.

Authors:  L J Tarnopolsky; J D MacDougall; S A Atkinson; M A Tarnopolsky; J R Sutton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-01

4.  Gender modulates the energy cost of muscle contraction in untrained healthy subjects. A 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis.

Authors:  J P Mattei; D Bendahan; M Roussel; Y Lefur; P J Cozzone
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Human skeletal muscle responses vary with age and gender during fatigue due to incremental isometric exercise.

Authors:  J A Kent-Braun; A V Ng; J W Doyle; T F Towse
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-11

Review 6.  American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  Metabolic bases of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption: a review.

Authors:  G A Gaesser; G A Brooks
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Energy cost of the ACSM single-set resistance training protocol.

Authors:  Wayne T Phillips; Joana R Ziuraitis
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years.

Authors:  J V Durnin; J Womersley
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.718

  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Energy Cost of Lower Body Dressing, Pop-Over Transfers, and Manual Wheelchair Propulsion in People with Paraplegia Due to Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Meaghan M Lynch; Zachary McCormick; Brian Liem; Geneva Jacobs; Peter Hwang; Thomas George Hornby; Leslie Rydberg; Elliot J Roth
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-12

3.  Nutrition and physical activity programs for obesity treatment (PRONAF study): methodological approach of the project.

Authors:  Augusto G Zapico; Pedro J Benito; Marcela González-Gross; Ana B Peinado; Esther Morencos; Blanca Romero; Miguel A Rojo-Tirado; Rocio Cupeiro; Barbara Szendrei; Javier Butragueño; Maite Bermejo; María Alvarez-Sánchez; Miguel García-Fuentes; Carmen Gómez-Candela; Laura M Bermejo; Ceila Fernandez-Fernandez; Francisco J Calderón
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Supersets do not change energy expenditure during strength training sessions in physically active individuals.

Authors:  M A Brentano; Daniel Umpierre; Lucas Porto Santos; André Luiz Lopes; Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.103

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.