Literature DB >> 12741877

Energy cost of the ACSM single-set resistance training protocol.

Wayne T Phillips1, Joana R Ziuraitis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was (a) to assess the energy cost and intensity of a single-set resistance training (RT) protocol conducted according to the recent ACSM guidelines and (b) to compare obtained values to those recently reported as eliciting health benefits via endurance-based physical activity (PA). Twelve subjects, mean age 26.7 +/- 3.8 years, performed 1 set of a 15 repetition maximum (15 RM) for each of 8 RT exercises. Metabolic data were collected via a portable calorimetric system. Training intensity in metabolic equivalents (METS) was 3.9 +/- 0.4 for men and 4.2 +/- 0.6 for women (not significant). Total energy was 135.20 +/- 16.6 kcal for men and 81.7 +/- 11.1 kcal for women (p < 0.008). We concluded that the ACSM single-set, 8-exercise RT protocol is a feasible alternative for achieving moderate-intensity (3-6 METS) PA, but it is not sufficient to achieve a moderate amount (150-200 kcal) of PA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12741877     DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0350:ecotas>2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  16 in total

1.  Aerobic energy expenditure during recreational weight training in females and males.

Authors:  Beth Morgan; Sarah J Woodruff; Peter M Tiidus
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  One-set resistance training elevates energy expenditure for 72 h similar to three sets.

Authors:  Timothy Heden; Curt Lox; Paul Rose; Steven Reid; Erik P Kirk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Minimal resistance training improves daily energy expenditure and fat oxidation.

Authors:  Erik P Kirk; Joseph E Donnelly; Bryan K Smith; Jeff Honas; James D Lecheminant; Bruce W Bailey; Dennis J Jacobsen; Richard A Washburn
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Contribution of anaerobic energy expenditure to whole body thermogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher B Scott
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.169

5.  Oxygen uptake and heart rate kinetics after different types of resistance exercise.

Authors:  Jeferson M Vianna; Francisco Z Werneck; Emerson F Coelho; Vinicius O Damasceno; Victor M Reis
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Determination of metabolic equivalents during low- and high-intensity resistance exercise in healthy young subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S Zanuso; M Bergamin; A Jimenez; G Pugliese; V D'Errico; A Nicolucci; A Ermolao; S Balducci
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.806

7.  Cardiovascular Fitness and Energy Expenditure Response during a Combined Aerobic and Circuit Weight Training Protocol.

Authors:  Pedro J Benito; María Alvarez-Sánchez; Víctor Díaz; Esther Morencos; Ana B Peinado; Rocio Cupeiro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy During Resistance Exercise at 80% 1RM.

Authors:  Jefferson M Vianna; Jorge P Lima; Francisco J Saavedra; Victor M Reis
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Energy cost of resistance exercises: an uptade.

Authors:  Victor M Reis; Roberto S Júnior; Adam Zajac; Diogo R Oliveira
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Misconceptions about Aerobic and Anaerobic Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Christopher Scott
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.