Literature DB >> 24627458

Statistical templates for visual search.

John F Ackermann1, Michael S Landy.   

Abstract

How do we find a target embedded in a scene? Within the framework of signal detection theory, this task is carried out by comparing each region of the scene with a "template," i.e., an internal representation of the search target. Here we ask what form this representation takes when the search target is a complex image with uncertain orientation. We examine three possible representations. The first is the matched filter. Such a representation cannot account for the ease with which humans can find a complex search target that is rotated relative to the template. A second representation attempts to deal with this by estimating the relative orientation of target and match and rotating the intensity-based template. No intensity-based template, however, can account for the ability to easily locate targets that are defined categorically and not in terms of a specific arrangement of pixels. Thus, we define a third template that represents the target in terms of image statistics rather than pixel intensities. Subjects performed a two-alternative, forced-choice search task in which they had to localize an image that matched a previously viewed target. Target images were texture patches. In one condition, match images were the same image as the target and distractors were a different image of the same textured material. In the second condition, the match image was of the same texture as the target (but different pixels) and the distractor was an image of a different texture. Match and distractor stimuli were randomly rotated relative to the target. We compared human performance to pixel-based, pixel-based with rotation, and statistic-based search models. The statistic-based search model was most successful at matching human performance. We conclude that humans use summary statistics to search for complex visual targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  image statistics; texture; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627458      PMCID: PMC3954043          DOI: 10.1167/14.3.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  35 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Functional architecture in monkey inferotemporal cortex revealed by in vivo optical imaging.

Authors:  G Wang; M Tanifuji; K Tanaka
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.304

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency.

Authors:  A E Burgess; B Colborne
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.

Authors:  A E Burgess; R F Wagner; R J Jennings; H B Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search.

Authors:  Ruth Rosenholtz; Jie Huang; Alvin Raj; Benjamin J Balas; Livia Ilie
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation.

Authors:  A Burgess
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  6 in total

1.  The perceptual processing capacity of summary statistics between and within feature dimensions.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Selectivity and tolerance for visual texture in macaque V2.

Authors:  Corey M Ziemba; Jeremy Freeman; J Anthony Movshon; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Visual Search Asymmetry: Deep Nets and Humans Share Similar Inherent Biases.

Authors:  Shashi Kant Gupta; Mengmi Zhang; Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe; Gabriel Kreiman
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2021-12

5.  Crowding and attention in a framework of neural network model.

Authors:  Endel Põder
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Opposing effects of selectivity and invariance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Corey M Ziemba; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.