Literature DB >> 24625519

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: frequency of complications in premature newborn depends on the insertion site.

P Panagiotounakou1, G Antonogeorgos2, E Gounari3, S Papadakis1, J Labadaridis1, A K Gounaris4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC lines) has reduced the mortality and morbidity of premature newborns. The usual sites of insertion are the veins in the upper arms but other locations are being used as well. STUDY
DESIGN: To examine whether using the axillary vein as a site of insertion of a PICC line affects the frequency of complications. Our study has a clinical trial design. A total of 62 neonates that had a PICC line inserted were recruited and randomly divided equally in two groups: in Group A (mean birth weight, standard deviation (s.d.)=1353 (142) g), the PICC line was inserted through the axillary vein, and in Group B (birth weight=1308 (112) g), the PICC line was inserted in other sites further from the axillary vein. The outcomes measured were the total PICC line-related complications, the reason for removing the catheter, the number of total attempts until successful insertion and the mean duration of stay of the catheter. The likelihood of having an adverse outcome was assessed with Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR).
RESULTS: Premature neonates with axillary PICC lines were 12 times less likely to have line-related complications (inflammation, blockage, edema, infection) as compared with any other site of insertion (OR= 95%, confidence interval (CI)=0.10 (0.01 to 0.8)) and they were seven times more likely to have the PICC line removed because they achieved full enteral nutrition as compared with the other causes (OR 95%, confidence interval (CI)=10.35 (4.88 to 21.96)). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the number of attempts until successful PICC line insertion (P=0.667) and the mean duration of stay of the PICC line (P=0.97).
CONCLUSION: The use of the axillary vein as a site of insertion of a PICC line was correlated with significantly less complications in premature newborns as opposed to the other sites of insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24625519     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  15 in total

1.  Percutaneous central venous catheterization in small infants: axillary block can facilitate the insertion rate.

Authors:  A Messeri; M Calamandrei
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.556

2.  A randomised, controlled trial of heparin in total parenteral nutrition to prevent sepsis associated with neonatal long lines: the Heparin in Long Line Total Parenteral Nutrition (HILLTOP) trial.

Authors:  Pita Birch; Simon Ogden; Michael Hewson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Comparison of risks from percutaneous central venous catheters and peripheral lines in infants of extremely low birth weight: a cohort controlled study of infants < 1000 g.

Authors:  G Liossis; C Bardin; A Papageorgiou
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-03

4.  Complications associated with central and non-central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  K Colacchio; Y Deng; V Northrup; M J Bizzarro
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Catheter dwell time and CLABSIs in neonates with PICCs: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Aaron M Milstone; Nicholas G Reich; Sonali Advani; Guoshu Yuan; Kristina Bryant; Susan E Coffin; W Charles Huskins; Robyn Livingston; Lisa Saiman; P Brian Smith; Xiaoyan Song
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Peripherally inserted central venous lines versus central lines in surgical newborns--a comparison.

Authors:  M Ragavan; S Gazula; D K Yadav; Sandeep Agarwala; M Srinivas; M Bajpai; V Bhatnagar; D K Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 7.  Unusual misplacement sites of percutaneous central venous lines in the very low birth weight neonate.

Authors:  R C Lussky; N Trower; D Fisher; R Engel; R Cifuentes
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Peripherally inserted central catheters may lower the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections in patients in surgical intensive care units.

Authors:  Mark Gunst; Kazuhide Matsushima; Sue Vanek; Richard Gunst; Shahid Shafi; Heidi Frankel
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.150

9.  The effect of low-dose heparin on maintaining peripherally inserted percutaneous central venous catheters in neonates.

Authors:  S Uslu; H Ozdemir; S Comert; F Bolat; A Nuhoglu
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Variations in central venous catheter-related infection risks among Canadian neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  Li-Yin Chien; Ying Macnab; Khalid Aziz; Wayne Andrews; Douglas D McMillan; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Challenges Associated with Route of Administration in Neonatal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Matthew W Linakis; Jessica K Roberts; Anita C Lala; Michael G Spigarelli; Natalie J Medlicott; David M Reith; Robert M Ward; Catherine M T Sherwin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Peripherally inserted central catheters optimize nutrient intake in moderately preterm infants.

Authors:  Anne L Smazal; Anne B Kavars; Susan J Carlson; Tarah T Colaizy; John M Dagle
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.756

3.  Indications and outcomes for tunneled central venous line placement via the axillary vein in children.

Authors:  Allison F Linden; Chase Corvin; Keva Garg; Richard R Ricketts; A Alfred Chahine
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review.

Authors:  Mari Takashima; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Amanda Ullman; Samantha Keogh; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study.

Authors:  Aikaterini Konstantinidi; Rozeta Sokou; Polytimi Panagiotounakou; Maria Lampridou; Stavroula Parastatidou; Katerina Tsantila; Eleni Gounari; Antonios K Gounaris
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Application of peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill newborns experience from a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Renfeng Li; Xia Cao; Tian Shi; Lei Xiong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  The axillary vein and its tributaries are not in the mirror image of the axillary artery and its branches.

Authors:  HyeYeon Lee; JongHo Bang; SooJung Kim; HeeJun Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction of Nonelective Central Venous Catheter Removal in Medically Complex Neonates.

Authors:  Lauren Beard; Claire Levek; Sunah Hwang; Theresa Grover
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-08-05

9.  Risk Factors Related to Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Nonselective Removal in Neonates.

Authors:  Xiaohe Yu; Shaojie Yue; Mingjie Wang; Chuanding Cao; Zhengchang Liao; Ying Ding; Jia Huang; Wen Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.