Literature DB >> 12820839

Comparison of risks from percutaneous central venous catheters and peripheral lines in infants of extremely low birth weight: a cohort controlled study of infants < 1000 g.

G Liossis1, C Bardin, A Papageorgiou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in infants of < 1000 g (extremely low birth weight; ELBW) the success rate of insertion of percutaneous central venous catheters (PCVC) and their duration; and the short- and long-term complications, i.e. mechanical and infectious, when compared to a control group of infants of the same age treated only with peripheral venous access. STUDY
DESIGN: A cohort of 44 ELBW infants managed with PCVC (study group) was compared to a cohort of 44 infants managed only with peripheral venous access (control group). The two groups were matched for birth weight, gestational age and gender, and were comparable for severity of illness (CRIB scores).
RESULTS: The success rate of PCVC insertion was 74% with the right axillary vein being the most frequently used site. The mean duration of PCVC treatment was 28 +/- 13 days. The reasons for removal of the catheter were: cessation of the total parenteral nutrition administration in 75% of the cases and occlusion in 25%. There were three infectious episodes for a total of 1138 catheter days in the PCVC group vs. 12 episodes for a total of 1114 days (p = 0.03) in the control group. Three infants died in the study group and 11 infants died in the control group (p = 0.05) of infants of ELBW.
CONCLUSION: Insertion of PCVC is successful in the vast majority of cases and carries a lower risk of infection than multiple insertions of peripheral lines in infants of ELBW. It prevents repeat and painful introductions of intravenous needles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12820839     DOI: 10.1080/jmf.13.3.171.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  6 in total

1.  Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: frequency of complications in premature newborn depends on the insertion site.

Authors:  P Panagiotounakou; G Antonogeorgos; E Gounari; S Papadakis; J Labadaridis; A K Gounaris
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Shifting from open surgical cut down to ultrasound-guided percutaneous central venous catheterization in children: learning curve and related complications.

Authors:  S Avanzini; E Guida; M Conte; F Faranda; P Buffa; C Granata; E Castagnola; G Fratino; L Mameli; A Michelazzi; A Pini-Prato; G Mattioli; A C Molinari; E Lanino; V Jasonni
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Percutaneous central venous catheters versus peripheral cannulae for delivery of parenteral nutrition in neonates.

Authors:  Sean Ainsworth; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-06

4.  Application of peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill newborns experience from a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Renfeng Li; Xia Cao; Tian Shi; Lei Xiong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Comparison of Risks from Central Venous Catheters and Peripheral Intravenous Lines among Term Neonates in a Tertiary Care Hospital, India.

Authors:  Vicknesh Ratchagame; Vetriselvi Prabakaran
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-05-24

Review 6.  Malfunctioning central venous catheters in children: a diagnostic approach.

Authors:  Alex Barnacle; Owen J Arthurs; Derek Roebuck; Melanie P Hiorns
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-10-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.