| Literature DB >> 24624200 |
Nadereh Rahbar1, Hooshang Parham2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrazine (ATZ) is a widely used herbicide in most countries because of its low cost and good selectivity. The concentration of ATZ that the EPA considers safe to consume in drinking water is 3 ppb. Therefore, recently, there have been concerns about its determination in trace levels. This compound is not electro-active, so in this research indirect electrochemical method for its detection in low levels was proposed.Entities:
Keywords: Atrazine; Cupric Oxide; Nanoparticles
Year: 2013 PMID: 24624200 PMCID: PMC3941897 DOI: 10.17795/jjnpp-9985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod ISSN: 1735-7780
Figure 1.The SW Voltammograms of Cu (II) in the (a) Absence and (b) Presence of ATZ on Modified Carbon Paste Electrode
Concentration of ATZ: 50.0 ng/mL; pH = 5; Accumulation Time: Three min; Conditioning Potential: -1.25 V; Conditioning Time: 10 sec; Pulse Height: 25 mV; Scan Increment: 2 mV; Frequency: 60 Hz.
Figure 2.a) The Effect of the Amount of CuO-nanoparticles (w/w %) Added to Paste, b) The Effect of the Sample Solution PH, c) The Effect of Conditioning Potential and d) The Effect of Accumulation Time on the Peak Current Intensity Differences of Cu (II) Voltammograms in the Absence and Presence of ATZ (at -0.1 V)
Conditions: Concentration of ATZ: 50 ng/mL, pulse height: 25 mV, frequency: 60 Hz.
Figure 3.Square Wave Voltammograms of Cu (II), Under Optimum Conditions, in the Presence of Different Concentrations of ATZ in the Test Solution
1) 0; 2) 5; 3) 10; 4) 15; 5) 25; 6) 40; 7) 50; 8) 60; 9) 75 ng/mL
Precision and Accuracy Data for SW Voltammetric Detection of ATZ in Water Using NMCPE [a ]
| ATZ Concentration | RSD, % | RE, % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Added, ng/mL | Found, Mean ± SD | Intra-day | Inter-day | |
|
| 10.2 ± 0.07 | 4.5 | 8.9 | 2 |
|
| 29.3 ± 0.14 | 3.7 | 6.6 | -2.5 |
|
| 58.3 ± 0.17 | 3.2 | 7.8 | -2.9 |
aIntra-day, n = 6; Inter-day, n = 6; Runs Per Day, Five Days
Determination of ATZ Content and Recovery Tests in Tap and River Water Samples With the Proposed Method (n = 6) [a ]
| Sample | Added ATZ, ng/mL | Found ATZ | Recovery, % |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | ND | - |
|
| 10.0 | 9.5 ± 0.1 | 95.0 |
|
| 50.0 | 50.2 ± 0.2 | 100.4 |
|
| 75.0 | 74.6 ± 0.3 | 99.5 |
|
| - | ND | - |
|
| 10.0 | 16.8 ± 0.5 | 96.0 |
|
| 50.0 | 58.0 ± 0.5 | 103.6 |
|
| 75.0 | 73.4 ± 0.4 | 97.8 |
aConditions: pH = 5.5, Accumulation Time: 3 min, Conditioning Potential: -1.25 V, Conditioning Time: 5 s, Pulse Height: 25 mV; Scan Increment: 2 mV; Frequency: 60 Hz
bx ± s
cTap Water Components: Ca2+ = 52, Mg2+ = 29, Na+ = 37; CO32- = 61, Cl- = 24; SO42- = 25, NO3- = 9 mg/mL, pH = 7.3, EC = 853
The Comparison of the Proposed Method (SW Voltammetric Determination of ATZ by NMCPE) With Some Reported Methods of ATZ or Other Triazine Herbicides [a ]
| Method | Detection Limit, ng/mL | Analysis Time, min | Recovery, % |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0045 | 100 | 70 |
|
| 0.12 | 100 | 87-114 |
|
| 1.20 | 20 | 84-95 |
|
| 0.002 | 30 | 80-120 |
|
| 0.001 | 25 | 72-109 |
|
| 1.3 | 40 | 96-107 |
|
| 1.3 | 30 | 66-88 |
|
| 3 | 25 | 87-101 |
|
| 8.3 | 20 | NR |
|
| 0.003 | 60 | NR |
|
| 2 | 10 | 92-116 |
|
| 4 | 30 | 95-101 |
|
| 0.024 | 25 | 95-109 |
|
| 2.0 | 10 | 95-104 |
aAbbreviations: GC-MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; HPLC-MS, high performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; LC-FL, liquid chomatography-fluorimetry; FI, flow injection; SPME, solid phase microextraction; EIS, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; V, voltammetric; ASV, anodic stripping voltammetry
bNot Reported